Literature DB >> 16775168

A sensitive method to quantify human long DNA in stool: relevance to colorectal cancer screening.

Hongzhi Zou1, Jonathan J Harrington, Kristie K Klatt, David A Ahlquist.   

Abstract

Human long DNA in stool may reflect nonapoptotic exfoliation and has been used as a colorectal cancer (CRC) marker. Targeting human-specific Alu repeats represents a logical but untested approach. A real-time Alu PCR assay was developed for quantifying long human DNA in stool and evaluated in this study. The accuracy and reproducibility of this assay and the stability of long DNA during room temperature fecal storage were assessed using selected patient stools and stools added to human DNA. Thereafter, long DNA levels were determined in blinded fashion from 18 CRC patients and 20 colonoscopically normal controls. Reproducibility of real-time Alu PCR for quantifying fecal long DNA was high (r2 = 0.99; P < 0.01). Long DNA levels in nonbuffered stools stored at room temperature fell a median of 75% by 1 day and 81% by 3 days. An EDTA buffer preserved DNA integrity during such storage. Human long DNA was quantifiable in all stools but was significantly higher in stools from CRC patients than from normal controls (P < 0.05). At a specificity of 100%, the sensitivity of long DNA for CRC was 44%. Results indicate that real-time Alu PCR is a simple method to sensitively quantify long human DNA in stool. This study shows that not all CRCs are associated with increased fecal levels of long DNA. Long DNA degrades with fecal storage, and measures to stabilize this analyte must be considered for optimal use of this marker.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16775168     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  31 in total

1.  Next-generation stool DNA test accurately detects colorectal cancer and large adenomas.

Authors:  David A Ahlquist; Hongzhi Zou; Michael Domanico; Douglas W Mahoney; Tracy C Yab; William R Taylor; Malinda L Butz; Stephen N Thibodeau; Linda Rabeneck; Lawrence F Paszat; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Niels Chr Bjerregaard; Søren Laurberg; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Barry M Berger; Graham P Lidgard
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  MicroRNAs as potential liquid biopsy biomarkers in colorectal cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Yuji Toiyama; Yoshinaga Okugawa; James Fleshman; C Richard Boland; Ajay Goel
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 10.680

3.  The stool DNA test is more accurate than the plasma septin 9 test in detecting colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  David A Ahlquist; William R Taylor; Douglas W Mahoney; Hongzhi Zou; Michael Domanico; Stephen N Thibodeau; Lisa A Boardman; Barry M Berger; Graham P Lidgard
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 11.382

4.  Detection of fecal interferon-induced transmembrane protein messenger RNA for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Chie Miyamoto; Nobuki Miyamoto; Hiroyuki Yamamoto; Kohzoh Imai; Yasuhisa Shinomura
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 5.  Molecular markers for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Brandon T Dickinson; John Kisiel; David A Ahlquist; William M Grady
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Fecal Recovery of Ingested Cellular DNA: Implications for Noninvasive Detection of Upper Gastrointestinal Neoplasms.

Authors:  Benjamin B Strauss; Tracy C Yab; Helen M O'Connor; William R Taylor; Douglas W Mahoney; Julie A Simonson; John Christensen; Suresh T Chari; David A Ahlquist
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  Multi-target stool DNA test: a new high bar for noninvasive screening.

Authors:  David A Ahlquist
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 8.  Colorectal cancer biomarkers: to be or not to be? Cautionary tales from a road well travelled.

Authors:  Kim Y C Fung; Edouard Nice; Ilka Priebe; Damien Belobrajdic; Aloke Phatak; Leanne Purins; Bruce Tabor; Celine Pompeia; Trevor Lockett; Timothy E Adams; Antony Burgess; Leah Cosgrove
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Circulating and stool nucleic acid analysis for colorectal cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Giulia De Maio; Claudia Rengucci; Wainer Zoli; Daniele Calistri
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Analysis of fecal DNA methylation to detect gastrointestinal neoplasia.

Authors:  Takeshi Nagasaka; Noriaki Tanaka; Harry M Cullings; Dong-Sheng Sun; Hiromi Sasamoto; Takuyuki Uchida; Minoru Koi; Naoshi Nishida; Yoshio Naomoto; C Richard Boland; Nagahide Matsubara; Ajay Goel
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.