Literature DB >> 16774833

The ATM-mediated DNA-damage response: taking shape.

Yosef Shiloh1.   

Abstract

Cellular responses to DNA damage are crucial for maintaining homeostasis and preventing the development of cancer. Our understanding of the DNA-damage response has evolved: whereas previously the focus was on DNA repair, we now appreciate that the response to DNA lesions involves a complex, highly branched signaling network. Defects in this response lead to severely debilitating, cancer-predisposing "genomic instability syndromes". Double strand breaks (DSBs) in DNA are potent triggers of the DNA-damage response, which is why they are used to study this pathway. The chief transducer of the DSB signal is the nuclear protein kinase ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM). Genetic, biochemical and structural studies have recently provided insights into the ATM-mediated DSB response, reshaping our view of this signaling pathway while raising new questions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16774833     DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2006.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci        ISSN: 0968-0004            Impact factor:   13.807


  230 in total

1.  Role for Rif1 in the checkpoint response to damaged DNA in Xenopus egg extracts.

Authors:  Sanjay Kumar; Hae Yong Yoo; Akiko Kumagai; Anna Shevchenko; Andrej Shevchenko; William G Dunphy
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Terminally differentiated astrocytes lack DNA damage response signaling and are radioresistant but retain DNA repair proficiency.

Authors:  L Schneider; M Fumagalli; F d'Adda di Fagagna
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 15.828

3.  Radiation therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy in a patient with a malignant glioneuronal tumor and underlying ataxia telangiectasia: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Mariko D DeWire; Chris Beltran; Frederick A Boop; Kathleen J Helton; David W Ellison; Peter J McKinnon; Amar Gajjar; Atmaram S Pai Panandiker
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Cyclin-C-dependent cell-cycle entry is required for activation of non-homologous end joining DNA repair in postmitotic neurons.

Authors:  A Tomashevski; D R Webster; P Grammas; M Gorospe; I I Kruman
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 15.828

5.  Genome-wide reinforcement of cohesin binding at pre-existing cohesin sites in response to ionizing radiation in human cells.

Authors:  Beom-Jun Kim; Yehua Li; Jinglan Zhang; Yuanxin Xi; Yumei Li; Tao Yang; Sung Yun Jung; Xuewen Pan; Rui Chen; Wei Li; Yi Wang; Jun Qin
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Differential DNA damage signaling accounts for distinct neural apoptotic responses in ATLD and NBS.

Authors:  Erin R P Shull; Youngsoo Lee; Hironobu Nakane; Travis H Stracker; Jingfeng Zhao; Helen R Russell; John H J Petrini; Peter J McKinnon
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 7.  HMGNs, DNA repair and cancer.

Authors:  Gabi Gerlitz
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2009-12-08

8.  Expression and maintenance of mitochondrial DNA: new insights into human disease pathology.

Authors:  Gerald S Shadel
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 9.  Mouse models of DNA double-strand break repair and neurological disease.

Authors:  Pierre-Olivier Frappart; Peter J McKinnon
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2008-05-23

10.  Radiosensitization of melanoma cells through combined inhibition of protein regulators of cell survival.

Authors:  Geoffrey E Johnson; Vladimir N Ivanov; Tom K Hei
Journal:  Apoptosis       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.