Literature DB >> 16774746

Electrophysiological dissociation of the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity.

C Chad Woodruff1, Hiroki R Hayama, Michael D Rugg.   

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were employed to investigate electrophysiological correlates of recognition memory in a task that allowed segregation of test items according to whether they were recollected (operationalized by introspective report) or, if recollection failed, their level of familiarity (operationalized by recognition confidence). The amplitude of a negative-going ERP deflection that onsets around 300 ms post-stimulus varied inversely with familiarity strength. This effect was maximal over the left frontal scalp. It did not differ between the ERPs elicited by highly familiar versus recollected items, indicating that the recollection is not merely a consequence of strong familiarity. By contrast, a later positive deflection (onset ca. 500 ms post-stimulus) was enhanced in ERPs elicited by recollected relative to highly familiar items. This effect was maximal over the left posterior scalp and was insensitive to familiarity, as indicated by its absence in the contrast between items judged highly familiar versus highly unfamiliar. The findings constitute a double dissociation between the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity. Together with the results of a parallel functional magnetic resonance imaging study (A.P. Yonelinas et al., J. Neurosci. (2005), 25, 3002-3008), they indicate that recollection and familiarity rely on qualitatively distinct neural systems and strongly support dual-process models of recognition memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16774746     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.05.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  86 in total

1.  The revealing glance: eye gaze behavior to concealed information.

Authors:  Charlotte Schwedes; Dirk Wentura
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05

2.  Recollection and familiarity make independent contributions to memory judgments.

Authors:  Lisa H Evans; Edward L Wilding
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The worth of pictures: using high density event-related potentials to understand the memorial power of pictures and the dynamics of recognition memory.

Authors:  Brandon A Ally; Andrew E Budson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Aging memory for pictures: using high-density event-related potentials to understand the effect of aging on the picture superiority effect.

Authors:  Brandon A Ally; Jill D Waring; Ellen H Beth; Joshua D McKeever; William P Milberg; Andrew E Budson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Content dependence of the electrophysiological correlates of recollection.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Johnson; Brian R Minton; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Memory retrieval and the parietal cortex: a review of evidence from a dual-process perspective.

Authors:  Kaia L Vilberg; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 7.  The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory.

Authors:  H Eichenbaum; A P Yonelinas; C Ranganath
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  Age differences in the neural correlates of the specificity of recollection: An event-related potential study.

Authors:  Erin D Horne; Joshua D Koen; Nedra Hauck; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Dissociation of the electrophysiological correlates of familiarity strength and item repetition.

Authors:  Sarah S Yu; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Event-related potential correlates of item and source memory strength.

Authors:  Brion Woroch; Brian D Gonsalves
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.