Literature DB >> 16774698

Telegenetic medicine: improved access to services in an underserved area.

H J Stalker1, R Wilson, H McCune, J Gonzalez, M Moffett, R T Zori.   

Abstract

We used telemedicine to improve genetics services to patients in the rural northwestern region of Florida. Patients were first seen via videoconference by a genetic counsellor, who obtained family and medical history. A local paediatrician then performed the physical examination, and a plan for evaluation was established. The videoconferencing equipment was connected at a bandwidth of 384 kbit/s, using three ISDN lines. During the first three telemedicine clinics, seven patients were evaluated and then returned to the centre for a face-to-face consultation with the clinical geneticist. No new diagnoses were made face-to-face that had not been identified by telemedicine. No diagnoses made by telemedicine were judged to be wrong when the child was evaluated face-to-face. During a two-year study of patient satisfaction with 12 telegenetics clinics, the 50 families evaluated via videoconferencing were asked to complete surveys; 40 surveys were returned (a response rate of 80%). All individuals either strongly agreed or agreed that the evaluation of their child was appropriate, sufficient and sufficiently protective of their child's privacy. The waiting time for a new patient consultation with the clinical genetics team was 16.9 months (SD 1.9) at the start and 3.0 months (SD 1.0) at the end of the trial period. The difference was significant (t-test, P < 0.0001). Telegenetics allows more rapid assurance that a genetic syndrome has not been identified, or a quicker initial evaluation and diagnosis for children who do have an identifiable genetic syndrome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16774698     DOI: 10.1258/135763306777488762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Telemed Telecare        ISSN: 1357-633X            Impact factor:   6.184


  19 in total

1.  The prospect of genome-guided preventive medicine: a need and opportunity for genetic counselors.

Authors:  Julianne M O'Daniel
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Genetic counselor opinions of, and experiences with telephone communication of BRCA1/2 test results.

Authors:  A R Bradbury; L Patrick-Miller; D Fetzer; B Egleston; S A Cummings; A Forman; L Bealin; C Peterson; M Corbman; J O'Connell; M B Daly
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 4.438

3.  Telegenetics use in presymptomatic genetic counselling: patient evaluations on satisfaction and quality of care.

Authors:  Ellen Otten; Erwin Birnie; Adelita V Ranchor; Irene M van Langen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Telemedicine uptake among Genetics Professionals in Europe: room for expansion.

Authors:  Ellen Otten; Erwin Birnie; Anneke M Lucassen; Adelita V Ranchor; Irene M Van Langen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Translating genomic testing results for pediatric critical care: Opportunities for genetic counselors.

Authors:  Natalie Deuitch; Sandra Soo-Jin Lee; Danton Char
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  Controversies in communication of genetic screening results for cancer: a report from the American Society of Preventive Oncology's Screening Special Interest Group (ASPO's 33rd Annual Meeting, March 8 to 10, 2009, Tampa, Florida).

Authors:  Linda Patrick-Miller; Angela R Bradbury; Mary Beth Terry
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Online genetic counseling from the providers' perspective: counselors' evaluations and a time and cost analysis.

Authors:  Ellen Otten; Erwin Birnie; Adelita V Ranchor; Irene M van Langen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  When access is an issue: exploring barriers to predictive testing for Huntington disease in British Columbia, Canada.

Authors:  Alice K Hawkins; Susan Creighton; Michael R Hayden
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Trends in telehealth versus on-site clinical genetics appointments in Manitoba: a comparative study.

Authors:  Alison M Elliott; Aizeddin A Mhanni; Sandra L Marles; Cheryl R Greenberg; Albert E Chudley; Gwendolyne C Nyhof; Bernard N Chodirker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Counseling customers: emerging roles for genetic counselors in the direct-to-consumer genetic testing market.

Authors:  Anna Harris; Susan E Kelly; Sally Wyatt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.