Literature DB >> 16774652

Self-efficacy, symptoms and physical activity in patients with an anterior cruciate ligament injury: a prospective study.

P Thomeé1, P Währborg, M Börjesson, R Thomeé, B I Eriksson, J Karlsson.   

Abstract

Self-efficacy belief may be of major importance for the outcome of rehabilitation after sports-related injuries. A new instrument, the Knee Self-Efficacy Scale (K-SES), was used to evaluate the role of perceived self-efficacy in patients with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. The purpose of this prospective exploratory study was to describe the patients' perceived self-efficacy at various times post-injury and surgery, respectively, for responsiveness of the K-SES and to correlate the K-SES score with the patients' subjective symptoms. The purpose was also to describe the influence of gender, age and physical activity on the patients' perceived self-efficacy. Thirty recently injured patients with an ACL-deficient knee and 33 patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction reported their physical activity level and their perceived self-efficacy on four test occasions during a 1-year period. The patients' subjective knee symptoms were documented on two of the test occasions. A significant increase in the K-SES score was seen after injury as well as after surgery, during the course of rehabilitation. Pre-operatively, men's perceived self-efficacy was significantly (P=0.013) higher compared with women's self-efficacy. Patients with a high baseline (pre-injury) physical activity level (Tegner 7-10) perceived their self-efficacy as being significantly (P=0.005) higher pre-operatively compared with patients with a low baseline activity level (Tegner 3-6). "Younger" (age 17-29), recently injured patients, perceived their self-efficacy as being significantly (P=0.034) higher compared with "older" patients (age 30-54). At the 12-month test, 15 of 30 patients with an ACL-deficient knee and 15 of 33 patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction reported that they had returned or nearly returned to their baseline physical activity level. The subjective knee outcome score, as measured by the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), improved significantly (P<0.01) during rehabilitation, apart from the KOOS subscale of "pain" (P=0.077) for patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction. There was a "low" to "strong" correlation (r(s)=0.0-0.7) between the K-SES and the five subscales in the KOOS. We conclude from the present study that K-SES has good responsiveness with significantly increased self-efficacy during the rehabilitation process for patients with an ACL-deficient knee as well as for patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction. The improvement in perceived self-efficacy could, however, only be partly explained by the improvement in subjective symptoms. Furthermore, self-efficacy differed significantly with gender, age and physical activity level early in the rehabilitation process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16774652     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2006.00557.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports        ISSN: 0905-7188            Impact factor:   4.221


  28 in total

Review 1.  The use of the Tegner Activity Scale for articular cartilage repair of the knee: a systematic review.

Authors:  Karen Hambly
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Self-reported activity level and knee function in amateur football players: the influence of age, gender, history of knee injury and level of competition.

Authors:  R B Frobell; E Svensson; M Göthrick; E M Roos
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Variables associated with return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sylvia Czuppon; Brad A Racette; Sandra E Klein; Marcie Harris-Hayes
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 4.  Return to Play after Patellar Stabilization.

Authors:  Seth L Sherman; Daniel P Deasis; Andrew J Garrone; Elliott E Voss; Harvey A Oliver
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-06

5.  Learned Helplessness After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Altered Neurocognitive State?

Authors:  Julie P Burland; Adam S Lepley; Marc Cormier; Lindsay J DiStefano; Robert Arciero; Lindsey K Lepley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Decision to Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Part I: A Qualitative Investigation of Psychosocial Factors.

Authors:  Julie P Burland; Jenny Toonstra; Jennifer L Werner; Carl G Mattacola; Dana M Howell; Jennifer S Howard
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  What can the first 2 months tell us about outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

Authors:  Jesse C Christensen; Laura R Goldfine; Tyler Barker; Dave S Collingridge
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Choosing surgery: patients' preferences within a trial of treatments for anterior cruciate ligament injury. A qualitative study.

Authors:  Carina A Thorstensson; L Stefan Lohmander; Richard B Frobell; Ewa M Roos; Rachael Gooberman-Hill
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Self-efficacy of knee function as a pre-operative predictor of outcome 1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Pia Thomeé; Peter Währborg; Mats Börjesson; Roland Thomeé; B I Eriksson; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Outcome and knee-related quality of life after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Eva Möller; Lars Weidenhielm; Suzanne Werner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.