Literature DB >> 16773645

A future approach to measuring relative skin sensitising potency: a proposal.

Ian R Jowsey1, David A Basketter, Carl Westmoreland, Ian Kimber.   

Abstract

Current approaches to skin sensitisation risk assessment are dependent upon the availability of information regarding two fundamental parameters. Firstly, data relating to the relative skin sensitising potency of the chemical, and secondly, information regarding likely conditions of human exposure. During the past two decades, much has been achieved in terms of refining methods capable of informing these parameters. For example, the development of the local lymph node assay (LLNA) has made it possible to predict skin sensitising hazard, and to determine relative skin sensitising potency, in a way that was not possible previously. Taken together with accurate information about predicted exposure, such potency data can be used to facilitate the derivation of effective risk assessments. However, although the LLNA provides an integrated assessment of skin sensitising activity, it does require the use of experimental animals and there is growing enthusiasm for designing robust alternative approaches that will reduce or obviate that need. Progress is being made in defining alternative experimental strategies that avoid animal use, but it is clear that accurate characterisation of skin sensitisation hazards will require the effective integration of various sources of information. For this reason, we exemplify here one possible approach that, in theory, provides a framework for not only the identification of skin sensitising chemicals, but also the estimation of relative sensitising potency. This paradigm depends upon development of an understanding of the various biological, biochemical and chemical factors that impact on the allergenic properties of chemicals and the acquisition of skin sensitisation, and an ability to measure these in vitro. Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16773645     DOI: 10.1002/jat.1146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Toxicol        ISSN: 0260-437X            Impact factor:   3.446


  10 in total

Review 1.  T-cell recognition of chemicals, protein allergens and drugs: towards the development of in vitro assays.

Authors:  Stefan F Martin; Philipp R Esser; Sonja Schmucker; Lisa Dietz; Dean J Naisbitt; B Kevin Park; Marc Vocanson; Jean-Francois Nicolas; Monika Keller; Werner J Pichler; Matthias Peiser; Andreas Luch; Reinhard Wanner; Enrico Maggi; Andrea Cavani; Thomas Rustemeyer; Anne Richter; Hermann-Josef Thierse; Federica Sallusto
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Application of nanotechnology in cosmetics.

Authors:  Li Mu; Robert L Sprando
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Rapid and simple kinetics screening assay for electrophilic dermal sensitizers using nitrobenzenethiol.

Authors:  Itai Chipinda; Risikat O Ajibola; Moshood K Morakinyo; Tinashe B Ruwona; Reuben H Simoyi; Paul D Siegel
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 3.739

4.  Perspectives on Non-Animal Alternatives for Assessing Sensitization Potential in Allergic Contact Dermatitis.

Authors:  Nripen S Sharma; Rohit Jindal; Bhaskar Mitra; Serom Lee; Lulu Li; Tim J Maguire; Rene Schloss; Martin L Yarmush
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.321

5.  A dual luciferase assay for evaluation of skin sensitizing potential of medical devices.

Authors:  Elisabeth Mertl; Elisabeth Riegel; Nicole Glück; Gabriele Ettenberger-Bornberg; Grace Lin; Sabrina Auer; Magdalena Haller; Angelika Wlodarczyk; Christoph Steurer; Christian Kirchnawy; Thomas Czerny
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.316

6.  Multivariate models for prediction of human skin sensitization hazard.

Authors:  Judy Strickland; Qingda Zang; Michael Paris; David M Lehmann; David Allen; Neepa Choksi; Joanna Matheson; Abigail Jacobs; Warren Casey; Nicole Kleinstreuer
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.446

Review 7.  In vitro methods for hazard assessment of industrial chemicals - opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Chin Lin Wong; Sussan Ghassabian; Maree T Smith; Ai-Leen Lam
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 8.  GINIplus and LISAplus - Design and selected results of two German birth cohorts about natural course of atopic diseases and their determinants.

Authors:  J Heinrich; I Brüske; C Cramer; U Hoffmann; M Schnappinger; B Schaaf; A von Berg; D Berdel; U Krämer; I Lehmann; O Herbarth; M Borte; A Grübl; C P Bauer; C Beckmann; H Behrendt; J Ring; S Koletzko
Journal:  Allergol Select       Date:  2017-08-04

9.  Validation of the GARD™skin Assay for Assessment of Chemical Skin Sensitizers: Ring Trial Results of Predictive Performance and Reproducibility.

Authors:  Henrik Johansson; Robin Gradin; Angelica Johansson; Els Adriaens; Amber Edwards; Veronika Zuckerstätter; Anders Jerre; Florence Burleson; Helge Gehrke; Erwin L Roggen
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Skin Doctor CP: Conformal Prediction of the Skin Sensitization Potential of Small Organic Molecules.

Authors:  Anke Wilm; Ulf Norinder; M Isabel Agea; Christina de Bruyn Kops; Conrad Stork; Jochen Kühnl; Johannes Kirchmair
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 3.739

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.