Literature DB >> 16773635

Dose-dependent attenuation of auditory phantom perception (tinnitus) by PET-guided repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Christian Plewnia1, Matthias Reimold, Arif Najib, Bernhard Brehm, Gerald Reischl, Stefan K Plontke, Christian Gerloff.   

Abstract

Recent data suggest that chronic tinnitus is a "phantom auditory perception" caused by maladaptive neuroplasticity and subsequent hyperactivity in an extended neuronal network including the primary auditory cortex, higher-order association areas, and parts of the limbic system. It was suggested that attenuation of this tinnitus-associated hyperactivity may offer a rational option for lasting tinnitus reduction. Here, we tested the hypothesis that tinnitus loudness can be attenuated by low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) individually navigated to cortical areas with excessive tinnitus-related activity as assessed by [(15)O]H(2)O positron-emission tomography (PET). Nine patients with chronic tinnitus underwent this combined functional imaging and rTMS-study. Group analysis of the PET data showed tinnitus-related increases of regional cerebral blood flow in the left middle and inferior temporal as well as right temporoparietal cortex and posterior cingulum. Repetitive TMS was performed at 1 Hz and 120% of the motor threshold for 5, 15, and 30 min, navigated to the individual maximum of tinnitus-related cortical hyperactivity. A noncortical stimulation site with the same distance to the ear served as sham control. Tinnitus loudness was reduced after temporoparietal, PET-guided low-frequency rTMS. This reduction, lasting up to 30 min, was dependent on the number of stimuli applied, differed from sham stimulation, and was negatively correlated with the length of the medical history of tinnitus in our patients. These data show the feasibility and effectiveness of rTMS guided by individual functional imaging to induce a lasting, dose-dependent attenuation of tinnitus. Of note, these effects were related to stimulation of cortical association areas, not primary auditory cortex, emphasizing the crucial role of higher-order sensory processing in the pathophysiology of chronic tinnitus. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 16773635      PMCID: PMC6871343          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  59 in total

Review 1.  Tinnitus Retraining Therapy (TRT) as a method for treatment of tinnitus and hyperacusis patients.

Authors:  P J Jastreboff; M M Jastreboff
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 2.  Auditory cortical plasticity: a comparison with other sensory systems.

Authors:  J P Rauschecker
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Repetitive TMS of the motor cortex improves ipsilateral sequential simple finger movements.

Authors:  M Kobayashi; S Hutchinson; H Théoret; G Schlaug; A Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Long-lasting increase in corticospinal excitability after 1800 pulses of subthreshold 5 Hz repetitive TMS to the primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Alexander Peinemann; Bibiana Reimer; Christian Löer; Angelo Quartarone; Alexander Münchau; Bastian Conrad; Hartwig Roman Siebner
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 5.  Functional heterogeneity in cingulate cortex: the anterior executive and posterior evaluative regions.

Authors:  B A Vogt; D M Finch; C R Olson
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Functional studies of the human auditory pathway after monaural stimulation with pure tones. Establishing a normal database.

Authors:  Marcos Goycoolea; Ismael Mena; Sonia Neubauer
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.494

7.  Slow transcranial magnetic stimulation can rapidly reduce resistant auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Emmanuel Poulet; Jérôme Brunelin; Benoit Bediou; Rémi Bation; Louis Forgeard; Jean Dalery; Thierry d'Amato; Mohamed Saoud
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 13.382

8.  Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in writer's cramp.

Authors:  H R Siebner; J M Tormos; A O Ceballos-Baumann; C Auer; M D Catala; B Conrad; A Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Transient suppression of tinnitus by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Christian Plewnia; Mathias Bartels; Christian Gerloff
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  Neuronavigated rTMS in a patient with chronic tinnitus. Effects of 4 weeks treatment.

Authors:  Berthold Langguth; Peter Eichhammer; Rainer Wiegand; Jörg Marienhegen; Peter Maenner; Peter Jacob; Göran Hajak
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2003-05-23       Impact factor: 1.837

View more
  58 in total

1.  Functional connectivity networks in nonbothersome tinnitus.

Authors:  Andre M Wineland; Harold Burton; Jay Piccirillo
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  High-frequency priming stimulation does not enhance the effect of low-frequency rTMS in the treatment of tinnitus.

Authors:  Berthold Langguth; Tobias Kleinjung; Elmar Frank; Michael Landgrebe; Philipp Sand; Jana Dvorakova; Ulrich Frick; Peter Eichhammer; Göran Hajak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Important methodological issues regarding the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation to investigate interoceptive processing: a Comment on Pollatos et al. (2016).

Authors:  Michel-Pierre Coll; Tegan Penton; Hannah Hobson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Reply to Coll et al. 'Important methodological issues regarding the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation to investigate interoceptive processing' (2017).

Authors:  Olga Pollatos; Thomas Kammer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Changes in interoceptive processes following brain stimulation.

Authors:  Olga Pollatos; Beate M Herbert; Sandra Mai; Thomas Kammer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Tinnitus and underlying brain mechanisms.

Authors:  Alexander V Galazyuk; Jeffrey J Wenstrup; Mohamed A Hamid
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.064

7.  Moderate therapeutic efficacy of positron emission tomography-navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for chronic tinnitus: a randomised, controlled pilot study.

Authors:  C Plewnia; M Reimold; A Najib; G Reischl; S K Plontke; C Gerloff
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2006-08-04       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  The Tinnitus Research Initiative (TRI) database: a new approach for delineation of tinnitus subtypes and generation of predictors for treatment outcome.

Authors:  Michael Landgrebe; Florian Zeman; Michael Koller; Yvonne Eberl; Markus Mohr; Jean Reiter; Susanne Staudinger; Goeran Hajak; Berthold Langguth
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Does a single session of theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation of inferior temporal cortex affect tinnitus perception?

Authors:  Csaba Poreisz; Walter Paulus; Tobias Moser; Nicolas Lang
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Efficacy and safety of bilateral continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) for the treatment of chronic tinnitus: design of a three-armed randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Carola Arfeller; Reinhard Vonthein; Stefan K Plontke; Christian Plewnia
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.