Literature DB >> 16772632

Manual vs device-assisted CPR: reconciling apparently contradictory results.

Roger J Lewis, James T Niemann.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2006        PMID： 16772632     DOI： 10.1001/jama.295.22.2661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN： 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  [Emergency physician and AutoPulse--a good duo in preclinical emergency services?: case example and report on experience].

Authors:  J-C Schewe; U Heister; A Hoeft; H Krep
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Effect of the AutoPulse automated band chest compression device on hemodynamics in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation.

Authors:  François-Xavier Duchateau; Papa Gueye; Sonja Curac; Florence Tubach; Claire Broche; Patrick Plaisance; Didier Payen; Jean Mantz; Agnès Ricard-Hibon
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Peter L Wang; Steven C Brooks
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-08-20

4.  Improved neurologically intact survival with the use of an automated, load-distributing band chest compression device for cardiac arrest presenting to the emergency department.

Authors:  Marcus Eng Hock Ong; Stephanie Fook-Chong; Annitha Annathurai; Shiang Hu Ang; Ling Tiah; Kok Leong Yong; Zhi Xiong Koh; Susan Yap; Papia Sultana
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 5.  Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hui Li; Dongping Wang; Yi Yu; Xiang Zhao; Xiaoli Jing
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 2.953
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.