Literature DB >> 16772248

Targeting screening mammography according to life expectancy among women undergoing dialysis.

Louise C Walter1, Karla Lindquist, Ann M O'Hare, Kirsten L Johansen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Screening guidelines recommend that mammography be targeted to women likely to live longer than 5 years. Because women undergoing dialysis have a reduced but variable life expectancy, their appropriate use of screening is controversial. Therefore, we conducted this study to describe national mammography rates among women undergoing dialysis with differing prognostic factors and to determine whether screening is targeted to healthier women who live longer.
METHODS: Using the US Renal Data System, we identified 17,090 women aged 50 years or older who started dialysis in 1997. We tracked women for 5 years to ascertain their use of screening mammography or death.
RESULTS: The 5-year survival rate was 25%. The biennial screening mammography rate was 25%, ranging from 12% for women aged 80 years or older to 69% for women who were ever on the transplant list. Women who were screened in the past year had a lower death rate than those who were not (hazards ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.59). Yet, 2198 women (13%) who died within 5 years underwent screening, and 2004 women (12%) who lived more than 5 years while receiving dialysis did not undergo screening.
CONCLUSIONS: Screening mammography rates are appropriately low among women undergoing dialysis because the 5-year survival rate is low. Screening is being targeted to women who are healthier and live longer. However, targeting could be improved by increasing screening in the few women undergoing dialysis with substantial life expectancies while decreasing screening in most women undergoing dialysis who live less than 5 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16772248     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.166.11.1203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  4 in total

1.  Development of a 5 year life expectancy index in older adults using predictive mining of electronic health record data.

Authors:  Jason Scott Mathias; Ankit Agrawal; Joe Feinglass; Andrew J Cooper; David William Baker; Alok Choudhary
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Potential overuse of screening mammography and its association with access to primary care.

Authors:  Alai Tan; Yong-Fang Kuo; James S Goodwin
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 3.  Benefits and Harms of Screening Mammography by Comorbidity and Age: A Qualitative Synthesis of Observational Studies and Decision Analyses.

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Louise C Walter; Monika Izano; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Progression of Medial Arterial Calcification in CKD.

Authors:  Shumila Manzoor; Syed Ahmed; Arshad Ali; Kum Hyun Han; Ioannis Sechopoulos; Ansley O'Neill; Baowei Fei; W Charles O'Neill
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2018-07-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.