Literature DB >> 16771803

Unit bias. A new heuristic that helps explain the effect of portion size on food intake.

Andrew B Geier1, Paul Rozin, Gheorghe Doros.   

Abstract

People seem to think that a unit of some entity (with certain constraints) is the appropriate and optimal amount. We refer to this heuristic as unit bias. We illustrate unit bias by demonstrating large effects of unit segmentation, a form of portion control, on food intake. Thus, people choose, and presumably eat, much greater weights of Tootsie Rolls and pretzels when offered a large as opposed to a small unit size (and given the option of taking as many units as they choose at no monetary cost). Additionally, they consume substantially more M&M's when the candies are offered with a large as opposed to a small spoon (again with no limits as to the number of spoonfuls to be taken). We propose that unit bias explains why small portion sizes are effective in controlling consumption; in some cases, people served small portions would simply eat additional portions if it were not for unit bias. We argue that unit bias is a general feature in human choice and discuss possible origins of this bias, including consumption norms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16771803     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01738.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  56 in total

1.  Transforming your life: an environmental modification approach to weight loss.

Authors:  Robert A Carels; Kathleen M Young; Afton Koball; Amanda Gumble; Lynn A Darby; Marissa Wagner Oehlhof; Carissa B Wott; Nova Hinman
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2010-10-07

2.  Leveraging the happy meal effect: Substituting food with modest nonfood incentives decreases portion size choice.

Authors:  Martin Reimann; Antoine Bechara; Deborah MacInnis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2015-09

3.  Influence of parents and friends on children's and adolescents' food intake and food selection.

Authors:  Sarah-Jeanne Salvy; Alison Elmo; Lauren A Nitecki; Melissa A Kluczynski; James N Roemmich
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Managing the pandemic of obesity: siding with the fox or the hedgehog?

Authors:  Michael Myslobodsky; Loring J Ingraham
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 3.942

Review 5.  Portion size and obesity.

Authors:  M Barbara E Livingstone; L Kirsty Pourshahidi
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 6.  Weighing the Evidence of Common Beliefs in Obesity Research.

Authors:  Krista Casazza; Andrew Brown; Arne Astrup; Fredrik Bertz; Charles Baum; Michelle Bohan Brown; John Dawson; Nefertiti Durant; Gareth Dutton; David A Fields; Kevin R Fontaine; Steven Heymsfield; David Levitsky; Tapan Mehta; Nir Menachemi; P K Newby; Russell Pate; Hollie Raynor; Barbara J Rolls; Bisakha Sen; Daniel L Smith; Diana Thomas; Brian Wansink; David B Allison
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 11.176

Review 7.  The tempted brain eats: pleasure and desire circuits in obesity and eating disorders.

Authors:  Kent C Berridge; Chao-Yi Ho; Jocelyn M Richard; Alexandra G DiFeliceantonio
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-11       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Mitigating the health risks of dining out: the need for standardized portion sizes in restaurants.

Authors:  Deborah A Cohen; Mary Story
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Perception of food amounts by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): the role of magnitude, contiguity, and wholeness.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Theodore A Evans; Chasity L Ratliff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2009-10

10.  Portion size: review and framework for interventions.

Authors:  Ingrid Hm Steenhuis; Willemijn M Vermeer
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 6.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.