Literature DB >> 16771713

Team-based approach reduces learning curve in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Hong Gee Sim1, Sidney Kam Hung Yip, Weber Kam On Lau, Yeh Hong Tan, Michael Yuet Chen Wong, Christopher Wai Sam Cheng.   

Abstract

AIM: We assessed the team approach in reducing the learning curve during our 2-year experience transiting from open to robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (rLRP).
METHODS: A team of three urologists progressed through assistant phase to console phase to obtain competency in robotic prostatectomy. One hundred patients underwent rLRP by this team using the da Vinci robotic surgical system from 1 February 2003 to 15 May 2005.
RESULTS: The immediate perioperative outcome was divided into three corresponding time frames and the results demonstrated gradual improvement in outcome parameters. The mean set-up time and dissection time were 24+/-14 min and 182+/-52 min, respectively. The mean perioperative blood loss was 272+/-240 mL, and 7% of patients (n=7) required blood transfusion. The mean duration of bladder catheterization was 8.4+/-4.1 days, and mean hospital stay was 2.9+/-1.6 days. There was no perioperative mortality or conversion to open radical prostatectomy. Major complications (4%) included urethrovesical leak requiring re-operation, postoperative cerebrovascular accident, and transient ureteric obstruction. Minor complications (7%) included minor urethrovesical leak, bladder neck stenosis, and urinary tract infection. Mean follow up was 6.6+/-5.0 months. Pathological assessment showed pT2 disease in 55% and pT3 in 45% of specimens.
CONCLUSIONS: A team-based approach to robot-assisted LRP helped to reduce the learning curve of the procedure for individual surgeons and continued to show significantly lower perioperative blood loss, transfusion requirements and postoperative pain compared to open radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16771713     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2006.01354.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  9 in total

Review 1.  Equipment and technology in surgical robotics.

Authors:  Hong Gee Sim; Sidney Kam Hung Yip; Christopher Wai Sam Cheng
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  [Robotic surgery in urology].

Authors:  S Buse; C Gilfrich; M Hohenfellner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Initial experience with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the Canadian health care system.

Authors:  Joseph L Chin; Patrick P Luke; Stephen E Pautler
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial 15 cases in Japan.

Authors:  K Yoshioka; T Hatano; Y Nakagami; C Ozu; Y Horiguchi; H Yonou; M Tachibana; G Coughlin; V R Patel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-05-22

5.  Developing technical expertise in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in a moderate-volume center through a proctor-based team approach.

Authors:  Shieh Ling Bang; Keng Siang Png; Yu Yi Yeow; Gerald Yau Min Tan; Yew Lam Chong
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2014-04-20

6.  Standardized surgical technique and dedicated operating room environment can reduce the operative time during robotic-assisted surgery for pelvic floor disorders.

Authors:  Surendra Mantoo; Jerome Rigaud; Sophie Naulet; Paul-Antoine Lehur; Guillaume Meurette
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-06-07

7.  The surgical ensemble: choreography as a simulation and training tool.

Authors:  Richard M Satava; Anne Marie Hunter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Learning tools and simulation in robotic surgery: state of the art.

Authors:  Nicolas C Buchs; François Pugin; Francesco Volonté; Philippe Morel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Simulation-based camera navigation training in laparoscopy-a randomized trial.

Authors:  Cecilia Nilsson; Jette Led Sorensen; Lars Konge; Mikkel Westen; Morten Stadeager; Bent Ottesen; Flemming Bjerrum
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 4.584

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.