Literature DB >> 16771507

Aptamers selected for higher-affinity binding are not more specific for the target ligand.

James M Carothers1, Stephanie C Oestreich, Jack W Szostak.   

Abstract

Previous study of eleven different in vitro-selected RNA aptamers that bind guanosine triphosphate (GTP) with K(d)s ranging from 8 microM to 9 nM showed that more information is required to specify the structures of the higher-affinity aptamers. We are interested in understanding how the more complex aptamers achieve higher affinities for the ligand. In vitro selection produces structural solutions to a functional problem that are are as simple as possible in terms of the information content needed to define them. It has long been assumed that the simplest way to improve the affinity of an aptamer is to increase the shape and functional group complementarity of the RNA binding pocket for the ligand. This argument underlies the hypothesis that selection for higher-affinity aptamers automatically leads to structures that bind more specifically to the target molecule. Here, we examined the binding specificities of the eleven GTP aptamers by carrying out competition binding studies with sixteen different chemical analogues of GTP. The aptamers have distinct patterns of specificity, implying that each RNA is a structurally unique solution to the problem of GTP binding. However, these experiments failed to provide evidence that higher-affinity aptamers bind more specifically to GTP. We suggest that the simplest way to improve aptamer K(d)s may be to increase the stability of the RNA tertiary structure with additional intramolecular RNA-RNA interactions; increasingly specific ligand binding may emerge only in response to direct selection for specificity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16771507      PMCID: PMC4287982          DOI: 10.1021/ja060952q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  27 in total

Review 1.  In vitro selection of functional nucleic acids.

Authors:  D S Wilson; J W Szostak
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 2.  Chance and necessity in the selection of nucleic acid catalysts.

Authors:  J R Lorsch; J W Szostak
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 22.384

3.  Solution structure of an informationally complex high-affinity RNA aptamer to GTP.

Authors:  James M Carothers; Jonathan H Davis; James J Chou; Jack W Szostak
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 4.942

4.  Use of intrinsic binding energy for catalysis by an RNA enzyme.

Authors:  K J Hertel; A Peracchi; O C Uhlenbeck; D Herschlag
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-08-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The structural basis for molecular recognition by the vitamin B 12 RNA aptamer.

Authors:  D Sussman; J C Nix; C Wilson
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2000-01

6.  Information content of binding sites on nucleotide sequences.

Authors:  T D Schneider; G D Stormo; L Gold; A Ehrenfeucht
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1986-04-05       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Probability model for molecular recognition in biological receptor repertoires: significance to the olfactory system.

Authors:  D Lancet; E Sadovsky; E Seidemann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Molecular recognition of cAMP by an RNA aptamer.

Authors:  M Koizumi; R R Breaker
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Molecular recognition in the FMN-RNA aptamer complex.

Authors:  P Fan; A K Suri; R Fiala; D Live; D J Patel
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-05-10       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Analysis of the role of phosphate oxygens in the group I intron from Tetrahymena.

Authors:  E L Christian; M Yarus
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1992-12-05       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  37 in total

Review 1.  Analysis of In Vitro Aptamer Selection Parameters.

Authors:  Maureen McKeague; Erin M McConnell; Jose Cruz-Toledo; Elyse D Bernard; Amanda Pach; Emily Mastronardi; Xueru Zhang; Michael Beking; Tariq Francis; Amanda Giamberardino; Ashley Cabecinha; Annamaria Ruscito; Rocio Aranda-Rodriguez; Michel Dumontier; Maria C DeRosa
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  In vitro selection of histone H4 aptamers for recognition imaging microscopy.

Authors:  Liyun Lin; Doris Hom; Stuart M Lindsay; John C Chaput
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 3.  Structural features of metabolite-sensing riboswitches.

Authors:  Catherine A Wakeman; Wade C Winkler; Charles E Dann
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 13.807

4.  Comprehensive experimental fitness landscape and evolutionary network for small RNA.

Authors:  José I Jiménez; Ramon Xulvi-Brunet; Gregory W Campbell; Rebecca Turk-MacLeod; Irene A Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Quantitative specificity-based display library screening identifies determinants of antibody-epitope binding specificity.

Authors:  Sejal S Hall; Patrick S Daugherty
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Evolution of functional nucleic acids in the presence of nonheritable backbone heterogeneity.

Authors:  Simon G Trevino; Na Zhang; Mark P Elenko; Andrej Lupták; Jack W Szostak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Improving the odds: Influence of starting pools on in vitro selection outcomes.

Authors:  Kelsey Pobanz; Andrej Lupták
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 8.  Carbohydrate recognition by boronolectins, small molecules, and lectins.

Authors:  Shan Jin; Yunfeng Cheng; Suazette Reid; Minyong Li; Binghe Wang
Journal:  Med Res Rev       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 12.944

9.  Enhanced functional potential of nucleic acid aptamer libraries patterned to increase secondary structure.

Authors:  Karen M Ruff; Thomas M Snyder; David R Liu
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  In silico selection of RNA aptamers.

Authors:  Yaroslav Chushak; Morley O Stone
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.