Literature DB >> 16768366

Reduced suppression or labile memory? Mechanisms of inefficient filtering of irrelevant information in older adults.

Monica Fabiani1, Kathy A Low, Emily Wee, Jeffrey J Sable, Gabriele Gratton.   

Abstract

Cognitive aging theories emphasize the decrease in efficiency of inhibitory processes and attention control in normal aging, which, in turn, may result in reduction of working memory function. Accordingly, some of these age-related changes may be due to faster sensory memory decay or to inefficient filtering of irrelevant sensory information (sensory gating). Here, event-related brain potentials and the event-related optical signal were recorded in younger and older adults passively listening to tone trains. To determine whether age differentially affects decay of sensory memory templates over short intervals, trains were separated by delays of either 1 or 5 sec. To determine whether age affects the suppression of responses to unattended repeated stimuli, we evaluated the brain activity elicited by successive train stimuli. Some trains started with a shorter-duration stimulus (deviant trains). Results showed that both electrical and optical responses to tones were more persistent with repeated stimulation in older adults than in younger adults, whereas the effects of delay were similar in the two groups. A mismatch negativity (MMN) was elicited by the first stimulus in deviant trains. This MMN was larger for 1- than 5-sec delay, but did not differ across groups. These data suggest that age-related changes in sensory processing are likely due to inefficient filtering of repeated information, rather than to faster sensory memory decay. This inefficient filtering may be due to, or interact with, reduced attention control. Furthermore, it may increase the noise levels in the information processing system and thus contribute to problems with working memory and speed of processing.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16768366     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.4.637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  37 in total

1.  Age-related differences in transfer costs: evidence from go/nogo tasks.

Authors:  Antonino Vallesi; Lynn Hasher; Donald T Stuss
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2010-12

2.  A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions.

Authors:  Jacki Janowich; Jyoti Mishra; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Use it or lose it? SES mitigates age-related decline in a recency/recognition task.

Authors:  Daniela Czernochowski; Monica Fabiani; David Friedman
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2007-02-05       Impact factor: 4.673

4.  Age-related top-down suppression deficit in the early stages of cortical visual memory processing.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Wesley Clapp; Jon Kelley; Kevin McEvoy; Robert T Knight; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Electrophysiological evidence for age effects on sensory memory processing of tonal patterns.

Authors:  Johanna Rimmele; Elyse Sussman; Christian Keitel; Thomas Jacobsen; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-08-08

6.  Effects of age on cognitive control during semantic categorization.

Authors:  Raksha A Mudar; Hsueh-Sheng Chiang; Mandy J Maguire; Jeffrey S Spence; Justin Eroh; Michael A Kraut; John Hart
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Comparable mechanisms of working memory interference by auditory and visual motion in youth and aging.

Authors:  Jyoti Mishra; Theodore Zanto; Aneesha Nilakantan; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Behavioral and Neural Markers of Flexible Attention over Working Memory in Aging.

Authors:  Robert M Mok; Nicholas E Myers; George Wallis; Anna Christina Nobre
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Fast optical imaging of human brain function.

Authors:  Gabriele Gratton; Monica Fabiani
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Preservation of crossmodal selective attention in healthy aging.

Authors:  Christina E Hugenschmidt; Ann M Peiffer; Thomas P McCoy; Satoru Hayasaka; Paul J Laurienti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.