BACKGROUND: Knowledge regarding the presence and location of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer is essential in deciding on the operative approach. Lymph node metastases have been diagnosed with imaging tests such as computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US); however, the accuracy of such diagnoses, based on size and shape criteria, has not been adequate. Ferumoxtran-10 (Combidex; Advanced Magnetics) is a lymphotropic contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) whose efficacy for the detection of metastatic lymph nodes in various cancers has been reported by several investigators; however, its efficacy for this purpose has not been reported for gastric cancer. We investigated the efficacy of ferumoxtran-10-enhanced MRI for the diagnosis of metastases to lymph nodes in gastric cancer. METHODS: Seventeen consecutive patients who were diagnosed with a nonearly stage of gastric cancer were enrolled in the study. All the patients were examined by MRI (Signa Horizon 1.5 T; GE Medical; T2*-weighted images) before and 24 h after the intravenous administration of ultrasmall particles of superparamagnetic iron oxide--ferumoxtran-10 (2.6 mg Fe/kg of body weight)--and the presence or absence of metastasis was determined from the enhancement patterns. The imaging results were compared with the corresponding histopathological findings following surgery. RESULTS: Of 781 lymph nodes dissected during surgery, the imaging results of 194 nodes could be correlated with their histopathological findings. Fifty-nine lymph nodes from 11 patients had histopathological metastases. In nonaffected normal lymph nodes, we observed dark signal intensity on MRI caused by the diffuse uptake of the contrast medium by macrophages resident in the lymph nodes, which phagocytose the iron oxide particles of ferumoxtran-10. The number of phagocytic macrophages was decreased in metastatic lymph nodes, and they showed various patterns of decreased uptake of ferumoxtran-10. Three enhancement patterns were observed in lymph nodes: (A) lymph nodes with overall dark signal intensity due to the diffuse uptake of ferumoxtran-10; (B) lymph nodes with partial high signal intensity due to partial uptake; and (C) no blackening of lymph nodes due to no uptake of ferumoxtran-10. Patterns (B) and (C) were defined as metastatic. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall predictive accuracy of postcontrast MRI were 100% (59/59), 92.6% (125/135), 85.5% (59/69), 100% (125/125), and 94.8% (184/194), respectively. These parameters for predictive accuracy were much superior to these parameters previously evaluated by CT or US. Nodes in the retroperitoneal and paraaortic regions were more readily identified and diagnosed on the MR images than those in the perigastric region. CONCLUSION: The present study confirmed that ferumoxtran-10-enhanced MRI is useful in the diagnosis of metastatic lymph nodes and that the use of this modality will be helpful in treatment decision-making for gastric cancer patients.
BACKGROUND: Knowledge regarding the presence and location of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer is essential in deciding on the operative approach. Lymph node metastases have been diagnosed with imaging tests such as computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US); however, the accuracy of such diagnoses, based on size and shape criteria, has not been adequate. Ferumoxtran-10 (Combidex; Advanced Magnetics) is a lymphotropic contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) whose efficacy for the detection of metastatic lymph nodes in various cancers has been reported by several investigators; however, its efficacy for this purpose has not been reported for gastric cancer. We investigated the efficacy of ferumoxtran-10-enhanced MRI for the diagnosis of metastases to lymph nodes in gastric cancer. METHODS: Seventeen consecutive patients who were diagnosed with a nonearly stage of gastric cancer were enrolled in the study. All the patients were examined by MRI (Signa Horizon 1.5 T; GE Medical; T2*-weighted images) before and 24 h after the intravenous administration of ultrasmall particles of superparamagnetic iron oxide--ferumoxtran-10 (2.6 mg Fe/kg of body weight)--and the presence or absence of metastasis was determined from the enhancement patterns. The imaging results were compared with the corresponding histopathological findings following surgery. RESULTS: Of 781 lymph nodes dissected during surgery, the imaging results of 194 nodes could be correlated with their histopathological findings. Fifty-nine lymph nodes from 11 patients had histopathological metastases. In nonaffected normal lymph nodes, we observed dark signal intensity on MRI caused by the diffuse uptake of the contrast medium by macrophages resident in the lymph nodes, which phagocytose the iron oxide particles of ferumoxtran-10. The number of phagocytic macrophages was decreased in metastatic lymph nodes, and they showed various patterns of decreased uptake of ferumoxtran-10. Three enhancement patterns were observed in lymph nodes: (A) lymph nodes with overall dark signal intensity due to the diffuse uptake of ferumoxtran-10; (B) lymph nodes with partial high signal intensity due to partial uptake; and (C) no blackening of lymph nodes due to no uptake of ferumoxtran-10. Patterns (B) and (C) were defined as metastatic. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall predictive accuracy of postcontrast MRI were 100% (59/59), 92.6% (125/135), 85.5% (59/69), 100% (125/125), and 94.8% (184/194), respectively. These parameters for predictive accuracy were much superior to these parameters previously evaluated by CT or US. Nodes in the retroperitoneal and paraaortic regions were more readily identified and diagnosed on the MR images than those in the perigastric region. CONCLUSION: The present study confirmed that ferumoxtran-10-enhanced MRI is useful in the diagnosis of metastatic lymph nodes and that the use of this modality will be helpful in treatment decision-making for gastric cancerpatients.
Authors: J J Bonenkamp; J Hermans; M Sasako; C J van de Velde; K Welvaart; I Songun; S Meyer; J T Plukker; P Van Elk; H Obertop; D J Gouma; J J van Lanschot; C W Taat; P W de Graaf; M F von Meyenfeldt; H Tilanus Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-03-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mukesh G Harisinghani; W Thomas Dixon; Mansi A Saksena; Elena Brachtel; Daniel J Blezek; Paritosh J Dhawale; Maha Torabi; Peter F Hahn Journal: Radiographics Date: 2004 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: A Cuschieri; S Weeden; J Fielding; J Bancewicz; J Craven; V Joypaul; M Sydes; P Fayers Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Alicia S Borggreve; Lucas Goense; Hylke J F Brenkman; Stella Mook; Gert J Meijer; Frank J Wessels; Marcel Verheij; Edwin P M Jansen; Richard van Hillegersberg; Peter S N van Rossum; Jelle P Ruurda Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Shaunagh McDermott; Sarah P Thayer; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Ralph Weissleder; Mukesh G Harisinghani Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2013-12-01 Impact factor: 4.243