Literature DB >> 16767362

Chemotherapy sensitivity and resistance testing: to be "standard" or to be individualized, that is the question.

Tetsuro Kubota1, Larry Weisenthal.   

Abstract

Radical surgery with extended lymph-node dissection is the treatment of first choice and the only curative treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer. While recent combination chemotherapy with S-1 (a combination of tegafur with two biomodulators, gimeracil and oteracil) has achieved high response rates, controversy still remains regarding the significance of adjuvant cancer chemotherapy after surgery. We have been applying chemosensitivity testing in evaluating the appropriate adjuvant cancer chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Our multiple studies have indicated that this chemosensitivity testing would be useful to improve the results of adjuvant chemotherapy, by increasing survivals in the sensitive group. The chemosensitivity testing is approved as "advanced clinical medicine" by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Labor at 11 institutes at present. While complete lymph-node dissection and chemosensitivity test-guided adjuvant chemotherapy has been reported to result in a survival benefit for patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer, the clinical utility of the testing should be established by means of prospective, randomized clinical trials. Two pivotal clinical trials have been initiated to clarify the utility of chemosensitivity testing in the selection of the appropriate adjuvant cancer chemotherapy for gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16767362     DOI: 10.1007/s10120-006-0366-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastric Cancer        ISSN: 1436-3291            Impact factor:   7.370


  36 in total

1.  Chemosensitivity test is useful in evaluating the appropriate adjuvant cancer chemotherapy for stage III non-scirrhous and scirrhous gastric cancers.

Authors:  S Abe; T Kubota; S W Matsuzaki; Y Otani; M Watanabe; T Teramoto; K Kumai; M Kitajima
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.480

2.  Chemosensitivity testing of clinical gastrointestinal cancers using histoculture and the MTT end-point.

Authors:  T Furukawa; T Kubota; M Watanabe; S Kase; T Takahara; H Yamaguchi; T Takeuchi; T Teramoto; K Ishibiki; M Kitajima
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.480

Review 3.  A systematic overview of chemotherapy effects in gastric cancer.

Authors:  K G Janunger; L Hafström; P Nygren; B Glimelius
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.089

4.  Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of published randomised trials. A study of the GISCAD (Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio dei Carcinomi dell'Apparato Digerente).

Authors:  E Mari; I Floriani; A Tinazzi; A Buda; M Belfiglio; M Valentini; S Cascinu; S Barni; R Labianca; V Torri
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Cancer chemotherapy chemosensitivity testing is useful in evaluating the appropriate adjuvant cancer chemotherapy for stages III/IV gastric cancers without peritoneal dissemination.

Authors:  Tetsuro Kubota; Tomohisa Egawa; Yoshihide Otani; Toshiharu Furukawa; Yoshiro Saikawa; Masashi Yoshida; Masahiko Watanabe; Koichiro Kumai; Masaki Kitajima
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.480

Review 6.  Chemotherapy of gastric cancer.

Authors:  D L Schipper; D J Wagener
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.248

7.  ERCC1 mRNA levels complement thymidylate synthase mRNA levels in predicting response and survival for gastric cancer patients receiving combination cisplatin and fluorouracil chemotherapy.

Authors:  R Metzger; C G Leichman; K D Danenberg; P V Danenberg; H J Lenz; K Hayashi; S Groshen; D Salonga; H Cohen; L Laine; P Crookes; H Silberman; J Baranda; B Konda; L Leichman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Prediction of sensitivity to fluoropyrimidines by metabolic and target enzyme activities in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Masanori Terashima; Hisataka Fujiwara; Akinori Takagane; Kaoru Abe; Takashi Irinoda; Tsutomu Nakaya; Hitoshi Yonezawa; Kenichi Oyama; Kazuyoshi Saito; Norio Kanzaki; Satoshi Ohtani; Tsuyoshi Nemoto; Yutaka Hoshino; Michihiko Kogure; Mitsukazu Gotoh
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 7.370

9.  MTT assay with reference to the clinical effect of chemotherapy.

Authors:  A Suto; T Kubota; Y Shimoyama; K Ishibiki; O Abe
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.454

10.  Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and messenger RNA levels in gastric cancer: possible predictor for sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil.

Authors:  Y Ishikawa; T Kubota; Y Otani; M Watanabe; T Teramoto; K Kumai; T Takechi; H Okabe; M Fukushima; M Kitajima
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  2000-01
View more
  9 in total

1.  Chemosensitivity test for 5-fluorouracil and 5-chloro-2, 4-dihydroxypyridine predicts outcome of gastric cancer patients receiving S-1 postoperatively.

Authors:  Kentaro Maejima; Akira Tokunaga; Teruo Kiyama; Hitoshi Kanno; Hideki Bou; Masanori Watanabe; Hideyuki Suzuki; Eiji Uchida
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Prognostic value of nuclear maspin expression for adjuvant 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ke-Feng Lei; Bing-Ya Liu; Xiao-Long Jin; Yan Guo; Min Ye; Zheng-Gang Zhu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Oncogramme, a new individualized tumor response testing method: application to colon cancer.

Authors:  Elodie Loum; Stephanie Giraud; Barbara Bessette; Serge Battu; Muriel Mathonnet; Christophe Lautrette
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 2.058

Review 4.  Metabolomic studies of human gastric cancer: review.

Authors:  Naresh Doni Jayavelu; Nadav S Bar
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Current status of methods to assess cancer drug resistance.

Authors:  Theodor H Lippert; Hans-Jörg Ruoff; Manfred Volm
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Benchmarking of gastric cancer sensitivity to anti-cancer drugs ex vivo as a basis for drug selection in systemic and intraperitoneal therapy.

Authors:  Bo Hultman; Haile Mahteme; Magnus Sundbom; Martin Ljungman; Rolf Larsson; Peter Nygren
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-12-21

7.  Somatic mutation of DNAH genes implicated higher chemotherapy response rate in gastric adenocarcinoma patients.

Authors:  Chunchao Zhu; Qin Yang; Jia Xu; Wenyi Zhao; Zizhen Zhang; Danhua Xu; Yeqian Zhang; Enhao Zhao; Gang Zhao
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 5.531

8.  Chemotherapy outcome predictive effectiveness by the Oncogramme: pilot trial on stage-IV colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Christophe Bounaix Morand du Puch; Michelle Nouaille; Stéphanie Giraud; Anaïs Labrunie; Sandrine Luce; Pierre-Marie Preux; François Labrousse; Alain Gainant; Nicole Tubiana-Mathieu; Valérie Le Brun-Ly; Denis Valleix; Angélique Guillaudeau; Laura Mesturoux; Béma Coulibaly; Christophe Lautrette; Muriel Mathonnet
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 9.  Prediction of Cancer Drug Resistance and Implications for Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Manfred Volm; Thomas Efferth
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 6.244

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.