Literature DB >> 12680150

Cancer chemotherapy chemosensitivity testing is useful in evaluating the appropriate adjuvant cancer chemotherapy for stages III/IV gastric cancers without peritoneal dissemination.

Tetsuro Kubota1, Tomohisa Egawa, Yoshihide Otani, Toshiharu Furukawa, Yoshiro Saikawa, Masashi Yoshida, Masahiko Watanabe, Koichiro Kumai, Masaki Kitajima.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because of the low chemosensitivity of gastric cancer to conventional antitumor agents, the role of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer is controversial. We have previously proposed the necessity to evaluate the appropriateness of particular adjuvant cancer chemotherapies in individual advanced gastric cancer patients using chemosensitivity testing. In the present study, we compared the chemosensitivity and clinical outcomes of patients with Stages III and IV gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 282 patients with advanced gastric cancer were analyzed retrospectively in terms of chemosensitivity as detected by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and survival outcome after surgery. Patients were split into groups according to Stage III or IV gastric cancer, then categorized into those that received surgery without chemotherapy (surgery-alone), and those that received adjuvant chemotherapy, for which all the evaluable cases were further divided into sensitive and resistant cases as determined by MTT assay.
RESULTS: For Stage III gastric cancer patients, the sensitive group had a more favorable survival outcome than the other two groups. For Stage IV gastric cancer patients, the sensitive groups, had a more favorable survival outcome than the other two groups, but only in the absence of peritoneal dissemination.
CONCLUSION: Chemosensitivity testing, based on the MTT assay, was useful in evaluating the appropriate cancer chemotherapy for patients with Stages III/IV gastric cancer without peritoneal dissemination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12680150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  6 in total

Review 1.  Chemotherapy sensitivity and resistance testing: to be "standard" or to be individualized, that is the question.

Authors:  Tetsuro Kubota; Larry Weisenthal
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Predictive value of MTT assay as an in vitro chemosensitivity testing for gastric cancer: one institution's experience.

Authors:  Bin Wu; Jin-Shui Zhu; Yi Zhang; Wei-Ming Shen; Qiang Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Chemosensitivity test for 5-fluorouracil and 5-chloro-2, 4-dihydroxypyridine predicts outcome of gastric cancer patients receiving S-1 postoperatively.

Authors:  Kentaro Maejima; Akira Tokunaga; Teruo Kiyama; Hitoshi Kanno; Hideki Bou; Masanori Watanabe; Hideyuki Suzuki; Eiji Uchida
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 4.  Chemotherapy as a component of multimodal therapy for gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Kodera; Michitaka Fujiwara; Masahiko Koike; Akimasa Nakao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Predictive value of in vitro adenosine triphosphate-based chemotherapy response assay in advanced gastric cancer patients who received oral 5-Fluorouracil after curative resection.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Lee; Min-Chan Kim; Sung Yong Oh; Hyuk-Chan Kwon; Sung-Hyun Kim; Kyung A Kwon; Suee Lee; Jin Sook Jeong; Seok-Reyol Choi; Hyo-Jin Kim
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 4.679

6.  Anti-Cancer Drug Sensitivity Assay with Quantitative Heterogeneity Testing Using Single-Cell Raman Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Yong Zhang; Jingjing Xu; Yuezhou Yu; Wenhao Shang; Anpei Ye
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 4.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.