Literature DB >> 16767350

User questionnaire to evaluate the radiological workspace.

Peter M A van Ooijen1, Allya P Koesoema, Matthijs Oudkerk.   

Abstract

Over the past few years, an increase in digitalization of radiology departments can be seen, which has a large impact on the work of the radiologists. This impact is not only demonstrated by the increased use of digital images but also by changing demands on the whole reading environment. In this study, we evaluated the satisfaction of our radiologists with our digital Picture Archival and Communication System environment and their workspace. This evaluation was performed by distribution of a questionnaire consisting of a score sheet and some open questions to all radiologists and residents. Out of 25 questionnaires, 12 were adequately answered and returned. Results clearly showed that most problems were present in the area of reading room design and layout and comfort and ergonomics. Based on the results from this study, adaptations were made and the results were also used in the planning of the redesign of the entire department of radiology.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16767350      PMCID: PMC3045168          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-006-0629-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  10 in total

1.  Computer-aided design and modeling of workstations and radiology reading rooms for the new millennium.

Authors:  O Ratib; D J Valentino; M J McCoy; J A Balbona; C L Amato; K Boots
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  From traditional reading rooms to a soft copy environment: radiologist satisfaction survey.

Authors:  Lori L Rumreich; Annette J Johnson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Evaluation of radiological workstations and web-browser-based image distribution clients for a PACS project in hands-on workshops.

Authors:  Thomas Boehm; Oliver Handgraetinger; Juergen Link; Ricardo Ploner; Daniel R Voellmy; Borut Marincek; Simon Wildermuth
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  PACS monitors: an evolution of radiologist's viewing techniques.

Authors:  W F Bennett; K K Vaswani; J A Mendiola; D G Spigos
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2002-03-21       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Design requirements for radiology workstations.

Authors:  Adrian Moise; M Stella Atkins
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 6.  Importance and effects of altered workplace ergonomics in modern radiology suites.

Authors:  Mukesh G Harisinghani; Michael A Blake; Mansi Saksena; Peter F Hahn; Debra Gervais; Michael Zalis; Leonor da Silva Dias Fernandes; Peter R Mueller
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Evaluating different radiology workstation interaction techniques with radiologists and laypersons.

Authors:  A Moise; M S Atkins; R Rohling
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Designing better radiology workstations: impact of two user interfaces on interpretation errors and user satisfaction.

Authors:  Adrian Moise; M Stella Atkins
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Environmental designs for reading from imaging workstations: ergonomic and architectural features. 1989.

Authors:  Steven C Horii; Howard N Horii; Seong Ki Mun; Harold R Benson; Robert K Zeman
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Multi-detector computed tomography and 3-dimensional imaging in a multi-vendor picture archiving and communications systems (PACS) environment.

Authors:  P M A Van Ooijen; A H H Bongaerts; R Witkamp; A Wijker; W Tukker; M Oudkerk
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.173

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Radiologist Digital Workspace Use and Preference: a Survey-Based Study.

Authors:  Arjun Sharma; Kenneth Wang; Eliot Siegel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.056

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.