Literature DB >> 15827830

Designing better radiology workstations: impact of two user interfaces on interpretation errors and user satisfaction.

Adrian Moise1, M Stella Atkins.   

Abstract

This paper presents our solution for supporting radiologists' interpretation of digital images by automating image presentation during sequential interpretation steps. We extended current hanging protocols with support for "stages" which reflect the presentation of digital information required to complete a single step within a complex task. We demonstrated the benefits of staging in a user experiment with 20 lay subjects involved in a comparative visual search for targets, similar to a radiology task of identifying anatomical abnormalities. We designed a task and a set of stimuli that allowed us to simulate the interpretation workflow from a typical radiology scenario-reading a chest radiography exam when a prior study is also available. The simulation was enabled by abstracting both the radiologist's task and the basic workstation navigation functionality. The staged interface was significantly faster than the traditional user interface, provided a 37% reduction in the interpretation errors, and improved user satisfaction.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15827830      PMCID: PMC3046708          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-004-1906-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  4 in total

1.  Design requirements for radiology workstations.

Authors:  Adrian Moise; M Stella Atkins
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  Workstation design. Image manipulation, image set handling, and display issues.

Authors:  S L Lou; H K Huang; R L Arenson
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  The digital imaging workstation.

Authors:  R L Arenson; D P Chakraborty; S B Seshadri; H L Kundel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Default display arrangements of images on PACS monitors.

Authors:  N H Strickland; D J Allison
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.039

  4 in total
  6 in total

1.  Evaluating different radiology workstation interaction techniques with radiologists and laypersons.

Authors:  A Moise; M S Atkins; R Rohling
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  User questionnaire to evaluate the radiological workspace.

Authors:  Peter M A van Ooijen; Allya P Koesoema; Matthijs Oudkerk
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Efficient whole-body MRI interpretation: evaluation of a dedicated software prototype.

Authors:  Patrick Asbach; Valer Canda; Kay-Geert A Hermann; Lasse Krug; Horst K Hahn; Bernd Hamm; Christian Klessen
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Satisfaction at work among radiologists.

Authors:  N Magnavita; A Fileni; A Bergamaschi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Virtual slide telepathology workstation of the future: lessons learned from teleradiology.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 6.  Human Factors and Human-Computer Considerations in Teleradiology and Telepathology.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2014-02-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.