Literature DB >> 16766655

Fitness cost of LINE-1 (L1) activity in humans.

Stephane Boissinot1, Jerel Davis, Ali Entezam, Dimitri Petrov, Anthony V Furano.   

Abstract

The self-replicating LINE-1 (L1) retrotransposon family is the dominant retrotransposon family in mammals and has generated 30-40% of their genomes. Active L1 families are present in modern mammals but the important question of whether these currently active families affect the genetic fitness of their hosts has not been addressed. This issue is of particular relevance to humans as Homo sapiens contains the active L1 Ta1 subfamily of the human specific Ta (L1Pa1) L1 family. Although DNA insertions generated by the Ta1 subfamily can cause genetic defects in current humans, these are relatively rare, and it is not known whether Ta1-generated inserts or any other property of Ta1 elements have been sufficiently deleterious to reduce the fitness of humans. Here we show that full-length (FL) Ta1 elements, but not the truncated Ta1 elements or SINE (Alu) insertions generated by Ta1 activity, were subject to negative selection. Thus, one or more properties unique to FL L1 elements constitute a genetic burden for modern humans. We also found that the FL Ta1 elements became more deleterious as the expansion of Ta1 has proceeded. Because this expansion is ongoing, the Ta1 subfamily almost certainly continues to decrease the fitness of modern humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16766655      PMCID: PMC1480451          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0603334103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  26 in total

1.  Hot L1s account for the bulk of retrotransposition in the human population.

Authors:  Brook Brouha; Joshua Schustak; Richard M Badge; Sheila Lutz-Prigge; Alexander H Farley; John V Moran; Haig H Kazazian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The open reading frame 1 of the L1Tc retrotransposon of Trypanosoma cruzi codes for a protein with apurinic-apyrimidinic nuclease activity.

Authors:  M Olivares; C Alonso; M C López
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1997-10-03       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Recently integrated Alu retrotransposons are essentially neutral residents of the human genome.

Authors:  Richard Cordaux; Jungnam Lee; Liv Dinoso; Mark A Batzer
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 3.688

4.  Transposable element distribution in Drosophila.

Authors:  C Biémont; A Tsitrone; C Vieira; C Hoogland
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Human L1 retrotransposon encodes a conserved endonuclease required for retrotransposition.

Authors:  Q Feng; J V Moran; H H Kazazian; J D Boeke
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-11-29       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 6.  The population genetics of Drosophila transposable elements.

Authors:  B Charlesworth; C H Langley
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 16.830

7.  The moments of stochastic integrals and the distribution of sojourn times.

Authors:  T Nagylaki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Biology of mammalian L1 retrotransposons.

Authors:  E M Ostertag; H H Kazazian
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 16.830

9.  The insertional history of an active family of L1 retrotransposons in humans.

Authors:  Stéphane Boissinot; Ali Entezam; Lynn Young; Peter J Munson; Anthony V Furano
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-06-14       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  LINE-mediated retrotransposition of marked Alu sequences.

Authors:  Marie Dewannieux; Cécile Esnault; Thierry Heidmann
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-08-03       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  70 in total

1.  The transposable element profile of the anolis genome: How a lizard can provide insights into the evolution of vertebrate genome size and structure.

Authors:  Marc Tollis; Stéphane Boissinot
Journal:  Mob Genet Elements       Date:  2011-07-01

2.  Phosphorylation of ORF1p is required for L1 retrotransposition.

Authors:  Pamela R Cook; Charles E Jones; Anthony V Furano
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Characterization of pre-insertion loci of de novo L1 insertions.

Authors:  Stephen L Gasior; Graeme Preston; Dale J Hedges; Nicolas Gilbert; John V Moran; Prescott L Deininger
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 3.688

4.  Loss of LINE-1 activity in the megabats.

Authors:  Michael A Cantrell; LuAnn Scott; Celeste J Brown; Armando R Martinez; Holly A Wichman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Retroelements and their impact on genome evolution and functioning.

Authors:  Elena Gogvadze; Anton Buzdin
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2009-08-02       Impact factor: 9.261

6.  Demography and weak selection drive patterns of transposable element diversity in natural populations of Arabidopsis lyrata.

Authors:  Steven Lockton; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra; Brandon S Gaut
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  TypeTE: a tool to genotype mobile element insertions from whole genome resequencing data.

Authors:  Clément Goubert; Jainy Thomas; Lindsay M Payer; Jeffrey M Kidd; Julie Feusier; W Scott Watkins; Kathleen H Burns; Lynn B Jorde; Cédric Feschotte
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Quantitative variation of LINE-1 sequences in five species and three subspecies of the subgenus Mus and in five Robertsonian races of Mus musculus domesticus.

Authors:  Paola Rebuzzini; Riccardo Castiglia; Solomon G Nergadze; George Mitsainas; Pavel Munclinger; Maurizio Zuccotti; Ernesto Capanna; Carlo Alberto Redi; Silvia Garagna
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2009-01-31       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  Mobile element scanning (ME-Scan) by targeted high-throughput sequencing.

Authors:  David J Witherspoon; Jinchuan Xing; Yuhua Zhang; W Scott Watkins; Mark A Batzer; Lynn B Jorde
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  A diversity of uncharacterized reverse transcriptases in bacteria.

Authors:  Dawn M Simon; Steven Zimmerly
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.