Literature DB >> 16765063

Suggestion overrides the Stroop effect in highly hypnotizable individuals.

Amir Raz1, Miguel Moreno-Iñiguez, Laura Martin, Hongtu Zhu.   

Abstract

Cognitive scientists distinguish between automatic and controlled mental processes. Automatic processes are either innately involuntary or become automatized through extensive practice. For example, reading words is a purportedly automatic process for proficient readers and the Stroop effect is consequently considered the "gold standard" of automated performance. Although the question of whether it is possible to regain control over an automatic process is mostly unasked, we provide compelling data showing that posthypnotic suggestion reduced and even removed Stroop interference in highly hypnotizable individuals. Drawing on a large sample of highly hypnotizable participants, we examined the effects of suggestion on Stroop performance both with and without a posthypnotic suggestion to perceive the input stream as meaningless symbols. We show that suggestion administered to highly hypnotizable persons significantly reduced Stroop interference and derailed a seemingly automatic process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16765063     DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2006.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  14 in total

1.  Suggestion does not de-automatize word reading: evidence from the semantically based Stroop task.

Authors:  Maria Augustinova; Ludovic Ferrand
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06

2.  Oxytocin impedes the effect of the word blindness post-hypnotic suggestion on Stroop task performance.

Authors:  Benjamin A Parris; Zoltan Dienes; Sarah Bate; Stace Gothard
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Selective biasing of a specific bistable-figure percept involves fMRI signal changes in frontostriatal circuits: a step toward unlocking the neural correlates of top-down control and self-regulation.

Authors:  Amir Raz; Melissa Lamar; Jason T Buhle; Michael J Kane; Bradley S Peterson
Journal:  Am J Clin Hypn       Date:  2007-10

4.  Association between Anterior Cingulate Neurochemical Concentration and Individual Differences in Hypnotizability.

Authors:  Danielle D DeSouza; Katy H Stimpson; Laima Baltusis; Matthew D Sacchet; Meng Gu; Ralph Hurd; Hua Wu; David C Yeomans; Nolan Willliams; David Spiegel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Executive control over unconscious cognition: attentional sensitization of unconscious information processing.

Authors:  Markus Kiefer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Talking to the senses: modulation of tactile extinction through hypnotic suggestion.

Authors:  Angelo Maravita; Mario Cigada; Lucio Posteraro
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Attentional sensitization of unconscious visual processing: Top-down influences on masked priming.

Authors:  Markus Kiefer; Sarah C Adams; Monika Zovko
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2012-02-15

8.  The impact of hypnotic suggestions on reaction times in continuous performance test in adults with ADHD and healthy controls.

Authors:  Maarit Virta; Seppo Hiltunen; Markus Mattsson; Sakari Kallio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Application of the ex-Gaussian function to the effect of the word blindness suggestion on Stroop task performance suggests no word blindness.

Authors:  Benjamin A Parris; Zoltan Dienes; Timothy L Hodgson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-09-20

10.  Hypnosis as neurophenomenology.

Authors:  Michael Lifshitz; Emma P Cusumano; Amir Raz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.