Literature DB >> 16764551

Selecting an appropriate placebo for a trial of spinal manipulative therapy.

Mark J Hancock1, Christopher G Maher, Jane Latimer, James H McAuley.   

Abstract

Selecting an appropriate control group or placebo for randomised controlled trials of spinal manipulative therapy is essential to the final interpretation and usefulness of these studies. Prior to starting a randomised controlled trial of spinal manipulative therapy for acute low back pain we wanted to ensure that the placebo selected would be considered appropriate by experts in the field thereby making the results more likely to be accepted and more likely to influence clinical practice. We developed ten placebo techniques that aimed to mimic spinal manipulative therapy as closely as possible which, while not including the active component of spinal manipulative therapy, were still credible. This list of placebo techniques with detailed descriptions was sent to 25 experts in the field from Australia and New Zealand including both clinicians and academics. We asked the experts to rate whether they believed each technique was appropriate for use as a placebo in a trial of spinal manipulative therapy. Sixteen (64%) of the experts responded. There were extremely low levels of agreement between the experts on which placebos were appropriate (kappa = 0.05, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.10). For nine of the ten placebos at least one expert considered the placebo to include the active component of spinal manipulative therapy while at least one other expert believed the same placebo was not only not active but also not credible. The results of this study demonstrate the different views of experts on what constitutes an appropriate placebo for trials of spinal manipulative therapy. Different beliefs about what is the active component of spinal manipulative therapy appear to be responsible for much of the disagreement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16764551     DOI: 10.1016/s0004-9514(06)70049-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust J Physiother        ISSN: 0004-9514


  20 in total

Review 1.  Imperfect placebos are common in low back pain trials: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  L A C Machado; S J Kamper; R D Herbert; C G Maher; J H McAuley
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  An examination of the observed placebo effect associated with the treatment of low back pain - a systematic review.

Authors:  Aaron A Puhl; Christine J Reinhart; Elizabeth R Rok; H Stephen Injeyan
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.037

3.  Validation of a sham comparator for thoracic spinal manipulation in patients with shoulder pain.

Authors:  Lori A Michener; Joseph R Kardouni; Catarina O Sousa; Jacqueline M Ely
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2014-09-06

4.  Spinal Manipulation Vs Sham Manipulation for Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jay K Ruddock; Hannah Sallis; Andy Ness; Rachel E Perry
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-05-25

5.  Validation of a novel sham cervical manipulation procedure.

Authors:  Howard T Vernon; John J Triano; James K Ross; Steven K Tran; David M Soave; Maricelle D Dinulos
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Spinal manipulative therapy-specific changes in pain sensitivity in individuals with low back pain (NCT01168999).

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Steven Z George; Maggie E Horn; Donald D Price; Roland Staud; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 5.820

7.  Independent evaluation of a clinical prediction rule for spinal manipulative therapy: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Mark J Hancock; Christopher G Maher; Jane Latimer; Robert D Herbert; James H McAuley
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  The objective evaluation of effectiveness of manual treatment of spinal function disturbances.

Authors:  Paweł Szulc; Jacek Lewandowski; Joanna Boch-Kmieciak; Paweł Berski; Marta Matusiak
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2012-05

9.  A randomised controlled trial of preventive spinal manipulation with and without a home exercise program for patients with chronic neck pain.

Authors:  Johanne Martel; Claude Dugas; Jean-Daniel Dubois; Martin Descarreaux
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  The Effects of 4 Weeks of Chiropractic Spinal Adjustments on Motor Function in People with Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Kelly Holt; Imran Khan Niazi; Imran Amjad; Nitika Kumari; Usman Rashid; Jens Duehr; Muhammad Samran Navid; Muhammad Shafique; Heidi Haavik
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-05-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.