Literature DB >> 34064209

The Effects of 4 Weeks of Chiropractic Spinal Adjustments on Motor Function in People with Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Kelly Holt1, Imran Khan Niazi1,2,3, Imran Amjad1,4, Nitika Kumari1,2, Usman Rashid2, Jens Duehr1, Muhammad Samran Navid1,3, Muhammad Shafique4, Heidi Haavik1.   

Abstract

Chiropractic spinal adjustments have been shown to result in short-term increases in muscle strength in chronic stroke patients, however, the effect of longer-term chiropractic spinal adjustments on people with chronic stroke is unknown. This exploratory study assessed whether 4 weeks of chiropractic spinal adjustments, combined with physical therapy (chiro + PT), had a greater impact than sham chiropractic with physical therapy (sham + PT) did on motor function (Fugl Meyer Assessment, FMA) in 63 subacute or chronic stroke patients. Secondary outcomes included health-related quality of life and other measures of functional mobility and disability. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 4 weeks (post-intervention), and 8 weeks (follow-up). Data were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models or generalized linear mixed models. A post-hoc responder analysis was performed to investigate the clinical significance of findings. At 4 weeks, there was a larger effect of chiro + PT, compared with sham + PT, on the FMA (difference = 6.1, p = 0.04). The responder analysis suggested the improvements in motor function seen following chiropractic spinal adjustments may have been clinically significant. There was also a robust improvement in both groups in most measures from baseline to the 4- and 8-week assessments, but between-group differences were no longer significant at the 8-week assessment. Four weeks of chiro + PT resulted in statistically significant improvements in motor function, compared with sham + PT, in people with subacute or chronic stroke. These improvements appear to be clinically important. Further trials, involving larger group sizes and longer follow-up and intervention periods, are required to corroborate these findings and further investigate the impacts of chiropractic spinal adjustments on motor function in post-stroke survivors. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03849794.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chiropractic spinal adjustment; health-related quality of life; motor function; physical therapy; recovery of function; stroke

Year:  2021        PMID: 34064209     DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11060676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Sci        ISSN: 2076-3425


  85 in total

1.  Patient perceptions of chiropractic treatment for primary care disorders.

Authors:  Jerrilyn A Cambron; Gregory D Cramer; James Winterstein
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 2.  Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  John W Krakauer
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.710

3.  Effectiveness of Chiropractic Care to Improve Sensorimotor Function Associated With Falls Risk in Older People: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Kelly R Holt; Heidi Haavik; Arier Chi Lun Lee; Bernadette Murphy; C Raina Elley
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 1.437

4.  Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Cerebral Hemodynamic Responses to Pain Following Thoracic Thrust Manipulation in Individuals With Neck Pain: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Cheryl L Sparks; Wen C Liu; Joshua A Cleland; Joseph P Kelly; Sarah J Dyer; Kathryn M Szetela; James M Elliott
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2017 Nov - Dec       Impact factor: 1.437

5.  Subclinical neck pain and the effects of cervical manipulation on elbow joint position sense.

Authors:  Heidi Haavik; Bernadette Murphy
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 6.  The fugl-meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties.

Authors:  David J Gladstone; Cynthia J Danells; Sandra E Black
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.919

7.  Similar motor recovery of upper and lower extremities after stroke.

Authors:  P W Duncan; L B Goldstein; R D Horner; P B Landsman; G P Samsa; D B Matchar
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Testing for baseline differences in randomized controlled trials: an unhealthy research behavior that is hard to eradicate.

Authors:  Michiel R de Boer; Wilma E Waterlander; Lothar D J Kuijper; Ingrid H M Steenhuis; Jos W R Twisk
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 6.457

9.  Top 10 research priorities relating to life after stroke--consensus from stroke survivors, caregivers, and health professionals.

Authors:  Alex Pollock; Bridget St George; Mark Fenton; Lester Firkins
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 5.266

10.  Subclinical recurrent neck pain and its treatment impacts motor training-induced plasticity of the cerebellum and motor cortex.

Authors:  Julianne K Baarbé; Paul Yielder; Heidi Haavik; Michael W R Holmes; Bernadette Ann Murphy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Chiropractic Spinal Adjustment Increases the Cortical Drive to the Lower Limb Muscle in Chronic Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Muhammad Samran Navid; Imran Khan Niazi; Dina Lelic; Imran Amjad; Nitika Kumari; Muhammad Shafique; Kelly Holt; Usman Rashid; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes; Heidi Haavik
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 4.003

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.