Literature DB >> 16763867

[Long-term functional results after macular hole surgery. Results of a prospective study].

I W Reiniger1, C A Gass, M Schaumberger, A Kampik, C Haritoglou.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study reports on the long-term results of macular hole surgery with peeling of the ILM.
METHODS: A total of 88 consecutive patients (71 female, 17 male, mean age 67 years) were prospectively evaluated. All patients underwent a standard pars plana vitrectomy with removal of the ILM and an intraocular gas tamponade. Preoperatively, as well as on each follow-up visit, a clinical examination including measurement of best corrected visual acuity, Goldman perimetry, and OCT was performed.
RESULTS: The mean postoperative follow-up was 49 months; 83 (94%) patients were pseudophakic at the last examination. Anatomic closure was achieved in 84 (95%) patients. No late reopening of the macular hole was observed. Best corrected visual acuity improved in 82 patients (93%), remained unchanged in 2, and deteriorated in 4 patients. Best corrected visual acuity improved from a median of 0.2 preoperatively to a median of 0.6 postoperatively (p<0.001). Duration of symptoms as well as low preoperative visual acuity had no significant impact on anatomic and functional success.
CONCLUSIONS: Macular hole surgery leads to good functional and anatomical results, even in the long term. A long history of visual impairment and low visual acuity before surgery are not contraindications to surgical intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16763867     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-006-1349-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  21 in total

1.  Late reopening of successfully treated macular holes.

Authors:  M Paques; P Massin; P Y Santiago; A C Spielmann; J F Le Gargasson; A Gaudric
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Ultrastructural features of tissue removed during idiopathic macular hole surgery.

Authors:  H S Yooh; H L Brooks; A Capone; N L L'Hernault; H E Grossniklaus
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Vision-threatening complications of surgery for full-thickness macular holes. Vitrectomy for Macular Hole Study Group.

Authors:  A S Banker; W R Freeman; J W Kim; D Munguia; S P Azen
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Peripheral visual field defects after macular hole surgery: a complication with decreasing incidence.

Authors:  C A Gass; C Haritoglou; E M Messmer; M Schaumberger; A Kampik
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Long-term follow-up after macular hole surgery with internal limiting membrane peeling.

Authors:  Christos Haritoglou; Carolin A Gass; Markus Schaumberger; Arnd Gandorfer; Michael W Ulbig; Anselm Kampik
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Vitrectomy for the treatment of full-thickness stage 3 or 4 macular holes. Results of a multicentered randomized clinical trial. The Vitrectomy for Treatment of Macular Hole Study Group.

Authors:  W R Freeman; S P Azen; J W Kim; W el-Haig; D R Mishell; I Bailey
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-01

7.  [Surgical management of complete macular foramina].

Authors:  O Liesenhoff; E M Messmer; A Pulur; A Kampik
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance after internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic macular holes.

Authors:  Yasuki Ito; Hiroko Terasaki; Akiko Takahashi; Tomomi Yamakoshi; Mineo Kondo; Makoto Nakamura
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Pars plana vitrectomy for treatment of stage 2 macular holes.

Authors:  A J Ruby; D F Williams; M G Grand; M A Thomas; T A Meredith; I Boniuk; R J Olk
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-03

10.  Visual field defects after macular hole surgery.

Authors:  H C Boldt; P M Munden; J C Folk; M G Mehaffey
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.258

View more
  6 in total

1.  [Diagnosis and evaluation of macular hole with the HRT 2 retina module].

Authors:  Z Michalewska; J Michalewski; J Nawrocki
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  [Can HRT be a useful tool in differentiating lamellar macular holes from full-thickness macular holes?].

Authors:  Z Michalewska; J Michalewski; J Nawrocki
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  [Staining techniques in macular surgery].

Authors:  C Haritoglou; A Kampik
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  [Rate of reopening of macular holes following cataract operation].

Authors:  A Hager; S Ehrich; W Wiegand
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  [Functional results after anatomically successful surgery for stage III/IV macular hole].

Authors:  J Wrede; C Engler; S Dithmar
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Correlation between foveal structure and visual outcome following macular hole surgery: a spectral optical coherence tomography study.

Authors:  Zofia Michalewska; Janusz Michalewski; Slawomir Cisiecki; Ron Adelman; Jerzy Nawrocki
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 3.117

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.