Literature DB >> 16762447

On the failure of modern species concepts.

Jody Hey1.   

Abstract

The modern age of species concepts began in 1942, when Ernst Mayr gave concept names to several different approaches to species identification. A long list of species concepts then followed, as well as a complex literature on their merits, motivations and uses. Some of these complexities arose as a consequence of the semantic shift that Mayr introduced, in which procedures for identifying species were elevated to concepts. Much of the debate in recent decades over concepts, and over pluralism versus monism, can be seen as an unnecessary consequence of treating species identification criteria as if they were more fundamental concepts. Recently, biologists have begun to recognize both the shortcomings of a lexicon of multiple species concepts and a common evolutionary idea that underlies them.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16762447     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  38 in total

Review 1.  Group selection and the development of the biological species concept.

Authors:  James Mallet
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  The integrative future of taxonomy.

Authors:  José M Padial; Aurélien Miralles; Ignacio De la Riva; Miguel Vences
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 3.172

3.  The relativity of biological function.

Authors:  Manfred D Laubichler; Peter F Stadler; Sonja J Prohaska; Katja Nowick
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 1.919

4.  Speciation slowing down in widespread and long-living tree taxa: insights from the tropical timber tree genus Milicia (Moraceae).

Authors:  K Daïnou; G Mahy; J Duminil; C W Dick; J-L Doucet; A S L Donkpégan; M Pluijgers; B Sinsin; P Lejeune; O J Hardy
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Utility of Classical α-Taxonomy for Biodiversity of Aquatic Nematodes.

Authors:  Wilfrida Decraemer; Thierry Backeljau
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.402

6.  A new approach to estimate parameters of speciation models with application to apes.

Authors:  Celine Becquet; Molly Przeworski
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Population structure and plumage polymorphism: The intraspecific evolutionary relationships of a polymorphic raptor, Buteo jamaicensis harlani.

Authors:  Joshua M Hull; David P Mindell; Sandra L Talbot; Emily H Kay; Hopi E Hoekstra; Holly B Ernest
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  A remarkable diversity of bone-eating worms (Osedax; Siboglinidae; Annelida).

Authors:  Robert C Vrijenhoek; Shannon B Johnson; Greg W Rouse
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 7.431

9.  The ontology of biological taxa.

Authors:  Stefan Schulz; Holger Stenzhorn; Martin Boeker
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Species delimitation and phylogeny of a New Zealand plant species radiation.

Authors:  Heidi M Meudt; Peter J Lockhart; David Bryant
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.