Literature DB >> 16760780

Stability of pedicle screws after kyphoplasty augmentation: an experimental study to compare transpedicular screw fixation in soft and cured kyphoplasty cement.

Oliver Linhardt1, Christian Lüring, Jan Matussek, Corinna Hamberger, Wolfgang Plitz, Joachim Grifka.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this cadaver study was to compare the stability of pedicle screws after implantation in soft or cured kyphoplasty cement.
METHODS: Pedicle screws were inserted in a total of 30 thoracolumbar vertebrae of 10 different human specimens: 10 screws were implanted in nonaugmented vertebrae (group 1), each 10 screws were placed in soft (group 2) and cured (group 3) cement. Pedicle screws were than evaluated for biomechanical axial pullout resistance.
RESULTS: Mean axial pullout strength was 232 N (range 60-600 N) in group 1, 452 N (range 60-1125 N) in group 2 and 367 N (range 112-840 N) in group 3. The paired Student t-test demonstrated a significant difference between pullout strength of groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.0300). Between pullout strength of groups 1 and 3 and between groups 2 and 3 no significant difference was seen.
CONCLUSION: We achieved a 1.9 times higher pullout strength with kyphoplasty augmentation of osteoporotic vertebrae compared with the pullout strength of nonaugmented vertebrae. Implantation of pedicle screws in cured cement is a sufficient method. With this method we found a 1.6 times higher pullout strength then in nonaugmented vertebrae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16760780     DOI: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000177212.52583.bd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  7 in total

1.  Osteoporotic L1 burst fracture treated by short-segment percutaneous stabilization with cement-augmented screws and kyphoplasty (hybrid technique).

Authors:  Andreas Pingel; Frank Kandziora; Christoph-Heinrich Hoffmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Timing of PMMA cement application for pedicle screw augmentation affects screw anchorage.

Authors:  Werner Schmoelz; Christian Heinz Heinrichs; Sven Schmidt; Angel R Piñera; Felix Tome-Bermejo; Javier M Duart; Marlies Bauer; Luis Álvarez Galovich
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Assessment of different screw augmentation techniques and screw designs in osteoporotic spines.

Authors:  S Becker; A Chavanne; R Spitaler; K Kropik; N Aigner; M Ogon; H Redl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Comparison between two pedicle screw augmentation instrumentations in adult degenerative scoliosis with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Yang Xie; Qiang Fu; Zi-qiang Chen; Zhi-cai Shi; Xiao-dong Zhu; Chuan-feng Wang; Ming Li
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Effect of bone material properties on effective region in screw-bone model: an experimental and finite element study.

Authors:  Shuai Liu; Wei Qi; Yang Zhang; Zi-Xiang Wu; Ya-Bo Yan; Wei Lei
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  Effects of polymethylmethacrylate on the stability of screw fixation in mandibular angle fractures: A study on sheep mandibles.

Authors:  Abdulkadir Burak Cankaya; Metin Berk Kasapoglu; Mehmet Ali Erdem; Cetin Kasapoglu
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  The Biomechanical Properties of Cement-Augmented Pedicle Screws for Osteoporotic Spines.

Authors:  Yuetian Wang; Lei Yang; Chunde Li; Haolin Sun
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-02-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.