R V Kanade1, R W M van Deursen, K Harding, P Price. 1. Research Centre for Clinical Kinaesiology, Department of Physiotherapy, Cardiff University, Ty Dewi Sant, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK.
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Walking is recommended as an adjunct therapy to diet and medication in diabetic patients, with the aim of improving physical fitness, glycaemic control and body weight reduction. Therefore we evaluated walking activity on the basis of capacity, performance and potential risk of plantar injury in the diabetic population before it can be prescribed safely. SUBJECTS, MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three subjects with diabetic neuropathy (DMPN) were compared with 23 patients with current diabetic foot ulcers, 16 patients with partial foot amputations and 22 patients with trans-tibial amputations. The capacity for walking was measured using a total heart beat index (THBI). Gait velocity and average daily strides were measured to assess the performance of walking, and its impact on weight-bearing was studied using maximum peak pressure. RESULTS: THBI increased (p<0.01) and gait velocity and daily stride count fell (p<0.001 for both) with progression of foot complications. The maximum peak pressures over the affected foot of patients with diabetic foot ulcers (p<0.05) and partial foot amputations (p<0.01) were higher than in the group with DMPN. On the contralateral side, the diabetic foot ulcer group showed higher maximum peak pressure over the total foot (p<0.05), and patients with partial foot amputations (p<0.01) and trans-tibial amputations (p<0.05) showed higher maximum peak pressure over the heel. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Walking capacity and performance decrease with progression of foot complications. Although walking is recommended to improve fitness, it cannot be prescribed in isolation, considering the increased risk of plantar injury. For essential walking we therefore recommend the use of protective footwear. Walking exercise should be supplemented by partial or non-weight-bearing exercises to improve physical fitness in diabetic populations.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Walking is recommended as an adjunct therapy to diet and medication in diabeticpatients, with the aim of improving physical fitness, glycaemic control and body weight reduction. Therefore we evaluated walking activity on the basis of capacity, performance and potential risk of plantar injury in the diabetic population before it can be prescribed safely. SUBJECTS, MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three subjects with diabetic neuropathy (DMPN) were compared with 23 patients with current diabetic foot ulcers, 16 patients with partial foot amputations and 22 patients with trans-tibial amputations. The capacity for walking was measured using a total heart beat index (THBI). Gait velocity and average daily strides were measured to assess the performance of walking, and its impact on weight-bearing was studied using maximum peak pressure. RESULTS: THBI increased (p<0.01) and gait velocity and daily stride count fell (p<0.001 for both) with progression of foot complications. The maximum peak pressures over the affected foot of patients with diabetic foot ulcers (p<0.05) and partial foot amputations (p<0.01) were higher than in the group with DMPN. On the contralateral side, the diabetic foot ulcer group showed higher maximum peak pressure over the total foot (p<0.05), and patients with partial foot amputations (p<0.01) and trans-tibial amputations (p<0.05) showed higher maximum peak pressure over the heel. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Walking capacity and performance decrease with progression of foot complications. Although walking is recommended to improve fitness, it cannot be prescribed in isolation, considering the increased risk of plantar injury. For essential walking we therefore recommend the use of protective footwear. Walking exercise should be supplemented by partial or non-weight-bearing exercises to improve physical fitness in diabetic populations.
Authors: G E Reiber; L Vileikyte; E J Boyko; M del Aguila; D G Smith; L A Lavery; A J Boulton Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Dina Brooks; Judith P Hunter; Janet Parsons; Emma Livsey; Janice Quirt; Michael Devlin Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: J C Garbalosa; P R Cavanagh; G Wu; J S Ulbrecht; M B Becker; I J Alexander; J H Campbell Journal: Foot Ankle Int Date: 1996-01 Impact factor: 2.827
Authors: Ann M Swartz; Scott J Strath; David R Bassett; J Brian Moore; Beth A Redwine; Maureen Groër; Dixie L Thompson Journal: Prev Med Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Helen Sheahan; Kimberley Canning; Nishka Refausse; Ewan M Kinnear; Greg Jorgensen; James R Walsh; Peter A Lazzarini Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2017-07-13 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Michael J Mueller; Lori J Tuttle; Joseph W Lemaster; Michael J Strube; Janet B McGill; Mary K Hastings; David R Sinacore Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2012-12-28 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Brittney S Lange-Maia; Anne B Newman; Jane A Cauley; Robert M Boudreau; John M Jakicic; Paolo Caserotti; Nancy W Glynn; Tamara B Harris; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Ann V Schwartz; Suzanne Satterfield; Eleanor M Simonsick; Aaron I Vinik; Sasa Zivkovic; Elsa S Strotmeyer Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2015-09-04 Impact factor: 3.966