Literature DB >> 16757655

Gene regulation divergence is a major contributor to the evolution of Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities between species of Drosophila.

Wilfried Haerty1, Rama S Singh.   

Abstract

The Dobzhansky-Muller model denotes incompatible gene interactions between diverging populations/species and is recognized as the basis of postzygotic reproductive isolation. Little is known about the molecular nature of such gene interactions. We have carried out comparative gene expression analyses in the testes of 3 closely related species of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup and their hybrids (all of which are sterile). We show that in hybrids 1) a higher proportion of male-biased genes (i.e., genes with a higher level of expression in males) are underexpressed (or not expressed) compared with non-sex-biased genes, 2) the majority of the underexpressed genes appear to be under stabilizing selection by virtue of showing similar levels of expression in the parental species, and only a small proportion of genes show signs of directional selection, 3) very few of the misexpressed genes are shared between species pairs, suggesting that there may not be a "common" set of "speciation genes," and 4) expression of non-testes-specific genes is observed in the testes of interspecific hybrids, and the number of such genes is positively correlated with divergence time. These results suggest that gene regulation divergence of sex- and reproduction-related genes is a major contributor to the evolution of Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities between species of Drosophila.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16757655     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msl033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  52 in total

Review 1.  Speciation genetics: current status and evolving approaches.

Authors:  Jochen B W Wolf; Johan Lindell; Niclas Backström
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Speciation genes in plants.

Authors:  Loren H Rieseberg; Benjamin K Blackman
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Male sex interspecies divergence and down regulation of expression of spermatogenesis genes in Drosophila sterile hybrids.

Authors:  Vignesh Sundararajan; Alberto Civetta
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Transcriptome-wide signature of hybrid breakdown associated with intrinsic reproductive isolation in lake whitefish species pairs (Coregonus spp. Salmonidae).

Authors:  S Renaut; L Bernatchez
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Neural divergence and hybrid disruption between ecologically isolated Heliconius butterflies.

Authors:  Stephen H Montgomery; Matteo Rossi; W Owen McMillan; Richard M Merrill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Genotype-dependent variation of mitochondrial transcriptional profiles in interpopulation hybrids.

Authors:  Christopher K Ellison; Ronald S Burton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Mechanisms Underlying Mammalian Hybrid Sterility in Two Feline Interspecies Models.

Authors:  Brian W Davis; Christopher M Seabury; Wesley A Brashear; Gang Li; Melody Roelke-Parker; William J Murphy
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 8.  Haldane's rule in the 21st century.

Authors:  M Schilthuizen; M C W G Giesbers; L W Beukeboom
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Third chromosome candidate genes for conspecific sperm precedence between D. simulans and D. mauritiana.

Authors:  Lisa Levesque; Barb Brouwers; Vignesh Sundararajan; Alberto Civetta
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 2.797

10.  A genome-wide analysis reveals no nuclear dobzhansky-muller pairs of determinants of speciation between S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus, but suggests more complex incompatibilities.

Authors:  Katy C Kao; Katja Schwartz; Gavin Sherlock
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.