Literature DB >> 16754712

Reducing transfer times for coronary angiography in patients with acute coronary syndromes: one solution to a national problem.

N G Bellenger1, T Wells, R Hitchcock, M Watkins, C Duffet, D Jewell, D Palliser, L Shapland, R Curtis, S Scrase, R Burns, N Curzen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are at high risk of further cardiac events and benefit from early intervention, as reflected by international guidelines recommending early transfer to interventional centres. The current average waiting time of up to 21 days contravenes evidence based early intervention, creates geographical inequity of access, wastes bed days, and is unsatisfactory for patients.
METHODS: A regional transfer unit (RTU) was created to expatriate access of ACS patients referred from other centres to the revascularisation service. By redesigning the care pathway patients arriving on the RTU undergo angiography within 24 hours, and then leave the RTU the following day, allowing other ACS patients to be treated.
RESULTS: During the first six months of the RTU, the mean waiting time from referral to procedure decreased from 20 (SD 15) days (range 0-51) to 8 (SD 3) days (range 0-21) for 365 patients transferred from a district general hospital. Ninety seven per cent of patients underwent angiography within 24 hours, 61% having undergone percutaneous coronary intervention at the same sitting, and 78% were discharged home within 24 hours.
CONCLUSIONS: Delivering standards laid out in the National Service Framework, reducing inequalities of care across the region, and facilitating evidence based strategies of care represents a challenging and complex issue. For high risk patients suffering ACS who need early invasive investigation, a coordinated network wide approach together with the creation of an RTU resulted in a 62% reduction in waiting times for no extra resources. Further improvements can be expected through increased capacity of this verified strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16754712      PMCID: PMC2563751          DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.2005.040162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  10 in total

Review 1.  Guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ECG ST segment elevation. British Cardiac Society Guidelines and Medical Practice Committee and Royal College of Physicians Clinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit.

Authors: 
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Hospital stay in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Nick G Bellenger; Jonas Eichhöfer; Dorothy Crone; Nicholas Curzen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-04-24       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  The role of revascularisation in the management of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: who should you refer?

Authors:  R Andrew Archbold; Nicholas P Curzen
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.659

4.  Troponin in patients with chest pain.

Authors:  N Curzen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-12-11

5.  Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban.

Authors:  C P Cannon; W S Weintraub; L A Demopoulos; R Vicari; M J Frey; N Lakkis; F J Neumann; D H Robertson; P T DeLucca; P M DiBattiste; C M Gibson; E Braunwald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-06-21       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Mortality by cause for eight regions of the world: Global Burden of Disease Study.

Authors:  C J Murray; A D Lopez
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-05-03       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Clinical outcomes, risk stratification and practice patterns of unstable angina and myocardial infarction without ST elevation: Prospective Registry of Acute Ischaemic Syndromes in the UK (PRAIS-UK)

Authors:  J Collinson; M D Flather; K A Fox; I Findlay; E Rodrigues; P Dooley; P Ludman; J Adgey; T J Bowker; R Mattu
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Outcome at 1 year after an invasive compared with a non-invasive strategy in unstable coronary-artery disease: the FRISC II invasive randomised trial. FRISC II Investigators. Fast Revascularisation during Instability in Coronary artery disease.

Authors:  L Wallentin; B Lagerqvist; S Husted; F Kontny; E Ståhle; E Swahn
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Are district general hospital patients with unstable angina at a disadvantage?

Authors:  C Miller; K Lipscomb; N Curzen
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.401

10.  Variations between countries in invasive cardiac procedures and outcomes in patients with suspected unstable angina or myocardial infarction without initial ST elevation. OASIS (Organisation to Assess Strategies for Ischaemic Syndromes) Registry Investigators.

Authors:  S Yusuf; M Flather; J Pogue; D Hunt; J Varigos; L Piegas; A Avezum; J Anderson; M Keltai; A Budaj; K Fox; L Ceremuzynski
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-08-15       Impact factor: 79.321

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Does a 'direct' transfer protocol reduce time to coronary angiography for patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes? A prospective observational study.

Authors:  S M Gallagher; M J Lovell; D A Jones; E Ferguson; A Ahktar; Z Buckhoree; A Wragg; C J Knight; A Mathur; E J Smith; S Cliffe; R A Archbold; M T Rothman; A K Jain
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Reducing time to angiography and hospital stay for patients with high-risk non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: retrospective analysis of a paramedic-activated direct access pathway.

Authors:  S Koganti; N Patel; A Seraphim; T Kotecha; M Whitbread; R D Rakhit
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.