D B Friedman1, L Hoffman-Goetz, J F Arocha. 1. Department of Health Studies and Gerontology, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, N2L 3G1.
Abstract
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: to assess the readability level of Web-based information on leading incident cancers. RESEARCH DESIGN: websites on breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers were selected for analysis by comparing the first 100 hits across 10 popular search engines. A total of 100 websites on breast (n=33), prostate (n=34), and colorectal (n=33) cancers were included in the final analysis. METHODS: readability was assessed using SMOG, Flesch-Kincaid (F - K), and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) measures. SMOG was hand-calculated on 10 - 30 lines of continuous text. Identical text was entered into Microsoft Word 2002 where F - K and FRE scores were determined automatically by the word processor. RESULTS: the mean readability score of the cancer websites was Grade 12.9 using SMOG and Grade 10.7 according to F - K. The mean FRE score was 45.3, a score considered 'difficult'. Colorectal cancer websites were most difficult to read compared to breast and prostate cancer websites. All measures indicated that prostate cancer websites were written at the lowest readability. Significantly higher reading levels were required for concluding paragraphs of Web articles compared to introduction paragraphs. CONCLUSIONS: findings suggest the need for readable cancer information on the Web. Health promoters, health informaticians, medical journalists, and web page editors must collaborate to ensure the use of plain language to match the literacy skills of consumers.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: to assess the readability level of Web-based information on leading incident cancers. RESEARCH DESIGN: websites on breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers were selected for analysis by comparing the first 100 hits across 10 popular search engines. A total of 100 websites on breast (n=33), prostate (n=34), and colorectal (n=33) cancers were included in the final analysis. METHODS: readability was assessed using SMOG, Flesch-Kincaid (F - K), and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) measures. SMOG was hand-calculated on 10 - 30 lines of continuous text. Identical text was entered into Microsoft Word 2002 where F - K and FRE scores were determined automatically by the word processor. RESULTS: the mean readability score of the cancer websites was Grade 12.9 using SMOG and Grade 10.7 according to F - K. The mean FRE score was 45.3, a score considered 'difficult'. Colorectal cancer websites were most difficult to read compared to breast and prostate cancer websites. All measures indicated that prostate cancer websites were written at the lowest readability. Significantly higher reading levels were required for concluding paragraphs of Web articles compared to introduction paragraphs. CONCLUSIONS: findings suggest the need for readable cancer information on the Web. Health promoters, health informaticians, medical journalists, and web page editors must collaborate to ensure the use of plain language to match the literacy skills of consumers.
Authors: Yuri Quintana; Darren Fahy; Bradley Crotty; Ruchira Jain; Eli Kaldany; Maxwel Gorenberg; Lewis Lipsitz; Diane Engorn; Jorge Rodriguez; Alex Orfanos; Adarsha Bajracharya; Juan Henao; May Adra; David Skerry; Warner V Slack; Charles Safran Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2018-12-05
Authors: Mette Terp Høybye; Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton; Jane Christensen; Lone Ross; Katrin Gaardbo Kuhn; Christoffer Johansen Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2009-07-05 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Ashli A Owen-Smith; Stephen Bent; Frances L Lynch; Karen J Coleman; Vincent M Yau; Kathryn A Pearson; Maria L Massolo; Virginia Quinn; Lisa A Croen Journal: Res Autism Spectr Disord Date: 2015-09-01