Literature DB >> 16754353

Characterization of the RF ablation-induced 'oven effect': the importance of background tissue thermal conductivity on tissue heating.

Zhengjun Liu1, Muneeb Ahmed, Yehuda Weinstein, Ming Yi, Roop L Mahajan, S Nahum Goldberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of background tissue thermal conductivity on RF ablation heating using ex vivo agar phantoms and computer modelling.
METHOD: Two-compartment cylindrical agar phantom models (5% agar, 5% NaCl, 3% sucrose) were constructed. These included a standardized inner compartment (2 cm diameter, 4 cm length, 0.25% agar) representing a tumour, surrounded by an outer compartment representing background tissue. The thermal conductivity of the outer compartment was varied from 0.48 W m-1 degrees Celsius (normal liver) to 0.23 W m-1 degrees Celsius (fat) by adding a fat-saturated oil-based solute (10-90%) to the agar. RF ablation was applied at 2000 mA current for 2 min. Temperatures were recorded up to 4 cm from the electrode tip at 1 cm intervals. Subsequently, a 2-D finite element computer model was used to simulate RF ablation of 2-24 min duration for tumours measuring 2-4 cm in diameter surrounded by tissues of different thermal conductivity with the presence or absence of perfusion (0-5 kg m-3 s-1) (n = 44). A comparison of results was performed.
RESULTS: In agar phantoms, the amount of fat in the background tissue correlated with thermal conductivity as a negative exponential function (r2 = 0.98). Significantly increased temperatures were observed at the edge of the inner compartment (1 cm from the electrode tip) as the fat content of the outer compartment increased (p < 0.01). Thus, temperatures at 2 min measured 31.5 +/- 2.2 degrees Celsius vs 45.1 +/- 3.1 degrees Celsius for thermal conductivities of 0.46 W m-1 degrees Celsius (10% fat) and 0.23 W m-1 degrees Celsius (90% fat), respectively. On the other hand, higher levels of fat led to lower temperature increases in the background compartment (0.2 +/- 0.3 degrees Celsius for 90% fat vs. 1.1 +/- 0.05 degrees Celsius for 10% fat, p < 0.05). Phantom thermal heating patterns correlated extremely well with computer modelling (r2 = 0.93), demonstrating that background tissues with low thermal conductivity increase heating within the central tumour, particularly for longer durations of RF ablation and in smaller tumours. Furthermore, computer modelling demonstrated that increases in temperature at the tumour margin for background tissues of lower thermal conductivity persisted in the presence of perfusion, with a clinically relevant 4.5 degrees Celsius difference between background thermal conductivities of fat and soft tissue for a 3 cm tumour with perfusion of 2 kg m-3 s-1, treated for 12 min.
CONCLUSION: Lower thermal conductivity of background tissues significantly increases temperatures within a defined ablation target. These findings provide insight into the 'oven effect' (i.e. increased heating efficacy for tumours surrounded by cirrhotic liver or fat) and highlight the importance of both the tumour and the surrounding tissue characteristics when contemplating RF ablation efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16754353     DOI: 10.1080/02656730600609122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia        ISSN: 0265-6736            Impact factor:   3.914


  25 in total

1.  Pulmonary thermal ablation: comparison of radiofrequency and microwave devices by using gross pathologic and CT findings in a swine model.

Authors:  Christopher L Brace; J Louis Hinshaw; Paul F Laeseke; Lisa A Sampson; Fred T Lee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Ablation Lesion Characterization in Scarred Substrate Assessed Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance.

Authors:  Susumu Tao; Michael A Guttman; Sarah Fink; Hassan Elahi; Kaustubha D Patil; Hiroshi Ashikaga; Aravindan D Kolandaivelu; Ronald D Berger; Marc K Halushka; Ehud J Schmidt; Daniel A Herzka; Henry R Halperin
Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-12-26

3.  Optimizing the protocol for pulmonary cryoablation: a comparison of a dual- and triple-freeze protocol.

Authors:  J Louis Hinshaw; Peter J Littrup; Nathan Durick; Winnie Leung; Fred T Lee; Lisa Sampson; Christopher L Brace
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Radiofrequency ablation for single lung tumours not suitable for surgery: seven years' experience.

Authors:  G Carrafiello; M Mangini; F Fontana; D Laganà; E Cotta; A Di Massa; F Piacentino; A Ianniello; C Floridi; A M Ierardi; C Fugazzola
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Gel Phantom Models for Radiofrequency and Microwave Ablation of the Liver.

Authors:  Willa J Chen; Qi Wang; Charles Y Kim
Journal:  Dig Dis Interv       Date:  2020-09-28

6.  Clinical evaluation of in silico planning and real-time simulation of hepatic radiofrequency ablation (ClinicIMPPACT Trial).

Authors:  Michael Moche; Harald Busse; Jurgen J Futterer; Camila A Hinestrosa; Daniel Seider; Philipp Brandmaier; Marina Kolesnik; Sjoerd Jenniskens; Roberto Blanco Sequeiros; Gaber Komar; Mika Pollari; Martin Eibisberger; Horst Rupert Portugaller; Philip Voglreiter; Ronan Flanagan; Panchatcharam Mariappan; Martin Reinhardt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Improving cancer therapies by targeting the physical and chemical hallmarks of the tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Jill W Ivey; Mohammad Bonakdar; Akanksha Kanitkar; Rafael V Davalos; Scott S Verbridge
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 8.679

8.  Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria--a 10-year update.

Authors:  Muneeb Ahmed; Luigi Solbiati; Christopher L Brace; David J Breen; Matthew R Callstrom; J William Charboneau; Min-Hua Chen; Byung Ihn Choi; Thierry de Baère; Gerald D Dodd; Damian E Dupuy; Debra A Gervais; David Gianfelice; Alice R Gillams; Fred T Lee; Edward Leen; Riccardo Lencioni; Peter J Littrup; Tito Livraghi; David S Lu; John P McGahan; Maria Franca Meloni; Boris Nikolic; Philippe L Pereira; Ping Liang; Hyunchul Rhim; Steven C Rose; Riad Salem; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Stephen B Solomon; Michael C Soulen; Masatoshi Tanaka; Thomas J Vogl; Bradford J Wood; S Nahum Goldberg
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 9.  Role of interventional radiology in managing pediatric liver tumors : Part 2: percutaneous interventions.

Authors:  C Matthew Hawkins; Alexander J Towbin; Derek J Roebuck; Eric J Monroe; Anne E Gill; Avnesh S Thakor; Richard B Towbin; Anne Marie Cahill; Matthew P Lungren
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-02-02

Review 10.  Radiofrequency and microwave ablation of the liver, lung, kidney, and bone: what are the differences?

Authors:  Christopher L Brace
Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol       Date:  2009 May-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.