Anirban Basu1, Herbert Y Meltzer. 1. Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Center for Health and the Social Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago IL 60637, USA. abasu@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the net growth in the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) in the population of patients with schizophrenia that may be attributable to the increased use of the class of atypical antipsychotics (A-APDs), adjusting for community trends in DM risk. METHODS: Using data from the National Hospital Discharge Survey, we perform trend analyses for prevalence of DM and general illness unrelated to insulin resistance in patients with schizophrenia, as well as in individuals without known mental illness, during three time periods: 1) prior to any A-APDs introduction (1979-1989); 2) short-term after their introduction (1990-1995), and long-term following their introduction (1996-2001). RESULTS: Trends in DM and general illness risks were comparable among inpatients with schizophrenia and those without mental illness during the pre-A-APD era and the short-term post-A-APDs era. During 1996-2001, the net difference in DM prevalence grew at an increasing rate (0.7% per year, p<0.001). By 2001, over a base DM prevalence of 10% in patients with schizophrenia, 3.1 percentage points (p=0.016) could be attributed to the use of A-APDs. There was no significant net growth in the prevalence of general illness during this period for these patients. This growth was most pronounced among African-American females and middle aged (35-49 years old) patients. This increased risk of DM translates into additional direct medical costs of $800 million per year. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of A-APDs, after a lag period, is associated with increased risk of DM. This needs to be considered in light of the advantages of these drugs in efficacy and tolerability. Long-term studies are necessary to identify the effect of individual A-APDs on DM risk.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the net growth in the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) in the population of patients with schizophrenia that may be attributable to the increased use of the class of atypical antipsychotics (A-APDs), adjusting for community trends in DM risk. METHODS: Using data from the National Hospital Discharge Survey, we perform trend analyses for prevalence of DM and general illness unrelated to insulin resistance in patients with schizophrenia, as well as in individuals without known mental illness, during three time periods: 1) prior to any A-APDs introduction (1979-1989); 2) short-term after their introduction (1990-1995), and long-term following their introduction (1996-2001). RESULTS: Trends in DM and general illness risks were comparable among inpatients with schizophrenia and those without mental illness during the pre-A-APD era and the short-term post-A-APDs era. During 1996-2001, the net difference in DM prevalence grew at an increasing rate (0.7% per year, p<0.001). By 2001, over a base DM prevalence of 10% in patients with schizophrenia, 3.1 percentage points (p=0.016) could be attributed to the use of A-APDs. There was no significant net growth in the prevalence of general illness during this period for these patients. This growth was most pronounced among African-American females and middle aged (35-49 years old) patients. This increased risk of DM translates into additional direct medical costs of $800 million per year. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of A-APDs, after a lag period, is associated with increased risk of DM. This needs to be considered in light of the advantages of these drugs in efficacy and tolerability. Long-term studies are necessary to identify the effect of individual A-APDs on DM risk.
Authors: Zsuzsanna Literati-Nagy; Kálmán Tory; Botond Literáti-Nagy; Attila Kolonics; László Vígh; László Vígh; József Mandl; Zoltán Szilvássy Journal: Pathol Oncol Res Date: 2012-06-30 Impact factor: 3.201