Literature DB >> 16751509

Effect of growth in biofilms on chlorine susceptibility of Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare.

Keesha A Steed1, Joseph O Falkinham.   

Abstract

Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare were grown in suspension and in biofilms, and their susceptibilities to chlorine were measured. M. avium and M. intracellulare readily adhered within 2 h, and numbers increased 10-fold in 30 days at room temperature in biofilms on both polystyrene flasks and glass beads. The chlorine resistance of M. avium and M. intracellulare cells grown and exposed to chlorine in biofilms was significantly higher than that of cells grown in suspension. Survival curves showed no evidence of a resistant, persisting population after 6 h of exposure to 1 mug chlorine/ml. The chlorine susceptibility of cells grown in biofilms and exposed in suspension (cells detached from bead surfaces) was also significantly higher than that of cells grown and exposed in suspension (planktonic cells), although it was lower than that of cells grown and exposed in biofilms. The higher resistance of the detached biofilm-grown cells was reversed upon their growth in suspension. There was a strong correlation between the chlorine susceptibility of cells of both M. avium and M. intracellulare and cell surface hydrophobicity measured by contact angle for both biofilm- and suspension-grown cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16751509      PMCID: PMC1489660          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02573-05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  46 in total

Review 1.  Riddle of biofilm resistance.

Authors:  K Lewis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Mycolic acid structure determines the fluidity of the mycobacterial cell wall.

Authors:  J Liu; C E Barry; G S Besra; H Nikaido
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1996-11-22       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Bacterial resistance to antibiotics: the role of biofilms.

Authors:  B D Hoyle; J W Costerton
Journal:  Prog Drug Res       Date:  1991

4.  Mycobacteria in public water supplies: comparative resistance to chlorine.

Authors:  P A Pelletier; G C du Moulin; K D Stottmeier
Journal:  Microbiol Sci       Date:  1988-05

5.  Recovery and survival of nontuberculous mycobacteria under various growth and decontamination conditions.

Authors:  R W Brooks; K L George; B C Parker; J O Falkinham; H Gruff
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Epidemiology of infection by nontuberculous mycobacteria. II. Growth and survival in natural waters.

Authors:  K L George; B C Parker; H Gruft; J O Falkinham
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1980-07

7.  Factors influencing numbers of Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellulare, and other Mycobacteria in drinking water distribution systems.

Authors:  J O Falkinham; C D Norton; M W LeChevallier
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 8.  The envelope of mycobacteria.

Authors:  P J Brennan; H Nikaido
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 23.643

9.  Direct measurement of chlorine penetration into biofilms during disinfection.

Authors:  D De Beer; R Srinivasan; P S Stewart
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Factors influencing the chlorine susceptibility of Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellulare, and Mycobacterium scrofulaceum.

Authors:  Joseph O Falkinham
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  40 in total

1.  Effect of growth in biofilms on chlorine susceptibility of Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare.

Authors:  Keesha A Steed; Joseph O Falkinham
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Survival of Mycobacterium avium in drinking water biofilms as affected by water flow velocity, availability of phosphorus, and temperature.

Authors:  Eila Torvinen; Markku J Lehtola; Pertti J Martikainen; Ilkka T Miettinen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Roles for cell wall glycopeptidolipid in surface adherence and planktonic dispersal of Mycobacterium avium.

Authors:  Robert Freeman; Henriette Geier; Kris M Weigel; Julie Do; Timothy E Ford; Gerard A Cangelosi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Efficient differentiation of Mycobacterium avium complex species and subspecies by use of five-target multiplex PCR.

Authors:  Sung Jae Shin; Byung Soo Lee; Won-Jung Koh; Elizabeth J B Manning; Kelly Anklam; Srinand Sreevatsan; Randall S Lambrecht; Michael T Collins
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of Antemortem and Environmental Samples for Zebrafish Health Monitoring and Quarantine.

Authors:  Marcus J Crim; Christian Lawrence; Robert S Livingston; Andrei Rakitin; Shane J Hurley; Lela K Riley
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 1.232

6.  Mycobacteriosis in zebrafish colonies.

Authors:  Christopher M Whipps; Christine Lieggi; Robert Wagner
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2012

7.  Biofilm formation by Mycobacterium avium isolates originating from humans, swine and birds.

Authors:  Tone Bjordal Johansen; Angelika Agdestein; Ingrid Olsen; Sigrun Fredsvold Nilsen; Gudmund Holstad; Berit Djønne
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 3.605

8.  Comparison of methods for processing drinking water samples for the isolation of Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare.

Authors:  Rachel Thomson; Robyn Carter; Chris Gilpin; Chris Coulter; Megan Hargreaves
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Genetic diversity of Mycobacterium avium isolates recovered from clinical samples and from the environment: molecular characterization for diagnostic purposes.

Authors:  Julio Alvarez; Ignacio Gómez García; Alicia Aranaz; Javier Bezos; Beatriz Romero; Lucía de Juan; Ana Mateos; Enrique Gómez-Mampaso; Lucas Domínguez
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Changes of the bacterial assemblages throughout an urban drinking water distribution system.

Authors:  Konstantinos Ar Kormas; Christos Neofitou; Maria Pachiadaki; Eulalia Koufostathi
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 2.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.