Literature DB >> 1675136

Thrombotic complications of silicone rubber catheters during autologous marrow and peripheral stem cell transplantation: prospective comparison of Hickman and Groshong catheters.

W D Haire1, R P Lieberman, G B Lund, J A Edney, A Kessinger, J O Armitage.   

Abstract

Thrombosis is common after placement of silicone rubber subclavian vein catheters in patients with malignancy receiving conventional doses of chemotherapy. To determine the incidence of this complication in marrow transplant patients and the effect of different catheter designs on thrombosis rates, patients were randomized to receive either open-ended Hickman catheters or valve-ended Groshong catheters for venous access during the transplantation procedure. A total of 35 catheters were placed, of which 23 were double-lumen (11 Groshong and 12 Hickman) and 12 were single-lumen (six Groshong and six Hickman). Arm venograms were performed on all patients at the time of hematopoietic recovery or occurrence of symptoms of subclavian vein thrombosis. There were 10 cases of total subclavian vein thrombosis (three were symptomatic) and 12 cases of asymptomatic non-occlusive mural thrombi. Only 13 normal veins were found. There was no difference in thrombosis rate between the Hickman and Groshong catheters. Double lumen catheters tended to be more likely to cause total venous occlusion (nine of 23) than single lumen catheters (one of 12) (p = 0.06, Fisher's exact test). We conclude that subclavian vein thrombosis is a common occurrence after placement of silicone rubber catheters for venous access during marrow transplantation. Most cases are asymptomatic. Groshong catheters are just as likely to cause this complication as Hickman catheters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1675136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  6 in total

Review 1.  Superior vena cava thrombosis secondary to hickman catheter and complete resolution after fibrinolytic therapy.

Authors:  M Morales; M Llanos; J Dorta
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  The prognostic significance of the ball-valve effect in Groshong catheters.

Authors:  B Tolar; J R Gould
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Venographic surveillance of tunneled venous access devices in adult oncology patients.

Authors:  M K Horne; D J May; H R Alexander; E P Steinhaus; E D Whitman; R C Chang; J L Doppman
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Comparison of complications between transjugular and axillosubclavian approach for placement of tunneled, central venous catheters in patients with hematological malignancy: a prospective study.

Authors:  Sang Hoon Lee; Seong Tai Hahn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  The use of an implantable central venous (Hickman) catheter for long-term venous access in dogs undergoing bone marrow transplantation.

Authors:  A C Abrams-Ogg; S A Kruth; R F Carter; V E Valli; S Kamel-Reid; I D Dubé
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 1.310

6.  Effectiveness of aspirin on double lumen permanent catheter efficacy in ESRD.

Authors:  Mohammad Mozafar; Majid Samsami; Mohammad Reza Sobhiyeh; Sayena Jabbehdari; Mahtab Fallah Zavareh
Journal:  Nephrourol Mon       Date:  2013-03-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.