Literature DB >> 16741716

Contralateral cerebellar damage impairs imperative planning but not updating of aimed arm movements in humans.

B E Fisher1, L Boyd, C J Winstein.   

Abstract

The specific motor control processes supported by the cerebellum and impaired with cerebellar damage remain unclear. The cerebellum has been implicated in both planning and updating of accurate movements. Previously, we used a statistical model to parcel aiming performance that was constrained by a timed-response paradigm into contributions attributed to a specified plan and feedforward updating. Here, we apply this procedure to determine the putative role of the cerebellum in planning and updating goal-directed aiming by comparing the performance of subjects with unilateral cerebellar stroke to controls. Subjects rapidly moved to targets in predictable or unpredictable conditions and cerebellar subjects used the contralesional limb to control for ipsilesional motor execution deficits. Displacement-derived movement velocity was used in the statistical model to determine the effect of planning and updating on accuracy. Compared to controls, the cerebellar group demonstrated errors in final position that were primarily determined by planning deficits. This finding is manifest in four ways: Cerebellar subjects (1) were less accurate than controls in both predictable and unpredictable conditions; (2) they showed minimal benefit from increased preparation time for target amplitude specification; (3) with ample time to plan direction, wrong direction response frequency was greater; and (4) final position was minimally determined by the plan. Because these deficits were found contralesional to the moving limb, the cerebellum's role in planning is not lateralized to one hemisphere but rather our findings suggest that cerebellar output affects motor planning for both upper limbs. Indeed, a lesion analysis showed that the dentate nucleus, an area implicated in planning motor strategies and the primary cerebellar output nucleus, was the only common region affected by our patient group with contralateral cerebellar strokes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16741716     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0482-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  52 in total

1.  Cerebellar projections to the prefrontal cortex of the primate.

Authors:  F A Middleton; P L Strick
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Timing of activity in cerebellar dentate nucleus and cerebral motor cortex during prompt volitional movement.

Authors:  W T Thach
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1975-05-02       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Differential involvement of parietal and precentral regions in movement preparation and motor intention.

Authors:  Daniel Thoenissen; Karl Zilles; Ivan Toni
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  From will to action: sequential cerebellar contributions to voluntary movement.

Authors:  Ernst Hülsmann; Michael Erb; Wolfgang Grodd
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Purkinje cell simple spike activity during grasping and lifting objects of different textures and weights.

Authors:  E Espinoza; A M Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Velocity-based planning of rapid elbow movements expands the control scheme of the equilibrium point hypothesis.

Authors:  Masataka Suzuki; Yoshihiko Yamazaki
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.621

7.  Comparison of cerebellothalamic and pallidothalamic projections in the monkey (Macaca fuscata): a double anterograde labeling study.

Authors:  S T Sakai; M Inase; J Tanji
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1996-04-29       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. II. Pulse height control.

Authors:  J Gordon; C Ghez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Movement-related cortical potentials in patients with cerebellar degeneration.

Authors:  I M Tarkka; S Massaquoi; M Hallett
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.209

10.  Anatomical evidence for cerebellar and basal ganglia involvement in higher cognitive function.

Authors:  F A Middleton; P L Strick
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-10-21       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  6 in total

1.  Evidence for a motor somatotopy in the cerebellar dentate nucleus--an FMRI study in humans.

Authors:  Michael Küper; Markus Thürling; Roxana Stefanescu; Stefan Maderwald; Johannes Roths; Hans G Elles; Mark E Ladd; Jörn Diedrichsen; Dagmar Timmann
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  The cerebellum, cerebellar disorders, and cerebellar research--two centuries of discoveries.

Authors:  Mario Manto
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  A cerebellar deficit in sensorimotor prediction explains movement timing variability.

Authors:  Jin Bo; Hannah J Block; Jane E Clark; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Rhythm, movement, and autism: using rhythmic rehabilitation research as a model for autism.

Authors:  Michelle W Hardy; A Blythe Lagasse
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-28

Review 5.  The role of the cerebellum in schizophrenia: an update of clinical, cognitive, and functional evidences.

Authors:  Hernàn Picard; Isabelle Amado; Sabine Mouchet-Mages; Jean-Pierre Olié; Marie-Odile Krebs
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  Differential Effects of Parietal and Cerebellar Stroke in Response to Object Location Perturbation.

Authors:  Trudy A Pelton; Alan M Wing; Dagmar Fraser; Paulette van Vliet
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.