Literature DB >> 16741285

Stimulation of hippocampal adenylyl cyclase activity dissociates memory consolidation processes for response and place learning.

Guillaume Martel1, Annabelle Millard, Robert Jaffard, Jean-Louis Guillou.   

Abstract

Procedural and declarative memory systems are postulated to interact in either a synergistic or a competitive manner, and memory consolidation appears to be a highly critical stage for this process. However, the precise cellular mechanisms subserving these interactions remain unknown. To investigate this issue, 24-h retention performances were examined in mice given post-training intrahippocampal injections of forskolin (FK) aiming at stimulating hippocampal adenylyl cyclases (ACs). The injection was given at different time points over a period of 9 h following acquisition in either an appetitive bar-pressing task or water-maze tasks challenging respectively "response memory" and "place memory." Retention testing (24 h) showed that FK injection altered memory formation only when given within a 3- to 6-h time window after acquisition but yielded opposite memory effects as a function of task demands. Retention of the spatial task was impaired, whereas retention of both the cued-response in the water maze and the rewarded bar-press response were improved. Intrahippocampal injections of FK produced an increase in pCREB immunoreactivity, which was strictly limited to the hippocampus and lasted less than 2 h, suggesting that early effects (0-2 h) of FK-induced cAMP/CREB activation can be distinguished from late effects (3-6 h). These results delineate a consolidation period during which specific cAMP levels in the hippocampus play a crucial role in enhancing memory processes mediated by other brain regions (e.g., dorsal or ventral striatum) while eliminating interference by the formation of hippocampus-dependent memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16741285      PMCID: PMC1475816          DOI: 10.1101/lm.149506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Mem        ISSN: 1072-0502            Impact factor:   2.460


  37 in total

1.  Differential activation of adenylyl cyclases by spatial and procedural learning.

Authors:  J L Guillou; G M Rose; D M Cooper
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Multiple memory systems: the power of interactions.

Authors:  Robert J McDonald; Bryan D Devan; Nancy S Hong
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.877

3.  Involvement of hippocampal cAMP/cAMP-dependent protein kinase signaling pathways in a late memory consolidation phase of aversively motivated learning in rats.

Authors:  R Bernabeu; L Bevilaqua; P Ardenghi; E Bromberg; P Schmitz; M Bianchin; I Izquierdo; J H Medina
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Effects of posttrial hippocampal stimulation on acquisition of operant behavior in the mouse.

Authors:  C Destrade; B Soumireu-Mourat; B Cardo
Journal:  Behav Biol       Date:  1973-06

5.  Time-dependent improvement of performance on appetitive tasks in mice.

Authors:  R Jaffard; C Destrade; B Soumireu-Moral; B Cardo
Journal:  Behav Biol       Date:  1974-05

6.  Amygdala modulation of hippocampal-dependent and caudate nucleus-dependent memory processes.

Authors:  M G Packard; L Cahill; J L McGaugh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-08-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Patterns of brain acetylcholine release predict individual differences in preferred learning strategies in rats.

Authors:  Christa K McIntyre; Lisa K Marriott; Paul E Gold
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.877

8.  Interaction between the human hippocampus and the caudate nucleus during route recognition.

Authors:  Nicol C Voermans; Karl Magnus Petersson; Leonie Daudey; Bernd Weber; Karel P Van Spaendonck; Hubertus P H Kremer; Guillén Fernández
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  The effects of ibotenic hippocampal lesions on discriminative fear conditioning to context in mice: impairment or facilitation depending on the associative value of a phasic explicit cue.

Authors:  Aline Desmedt; Aline Marighetto; René Garcia; Robert Jaffard
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Effects of age and spatial learning on adenylyl cyclase mRNA expression in the mouse hippocampus.

Authors:  N Mons; L Segu; X Nogues; M C Buhot
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.673

View more
  4 in total

1.  Hippocampal SSTR4 somatostatin receptors control the selection of memory strategies.

Authors:  François Gastambide; Cécile Viollet; Gabriel Lepousez; Jacques Epelbaum; Jean-Louis Guillou
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Roles of Hippocampal Somatostatin Receptor Subtypes in Stress Response and Emotionality.

Authors:  Thomas D Prévôt; François Gastambide; Cécile Viollet; Nadia Henkous; Guillaume Martel; Jacques Epelbaum; Daniel Béracochéa; Jean-Louis Guillou
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  Morphine Reward Promotes Cue-Sensitive Learning: Implication of Dorsal Striatal CREB Activity.

Authors:  Mathieu Baudonnat; Jean-Louis Guillou; Marianne Husson; Veronique D Bohbot; Lars Schwabe; Vincent David
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.157

4.  Retrieval of Consolidated Spatial Memory in the Water Maze Is Correlated with Expression of pCREB and Egr1 in the Hippocampus of Aged Mice.

Authors:  Guoxia Zhou; Wanxia Xiong; Xiaoguang Zhang; Shengjin Ge
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra       Date:  2013-02-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.