Literature DB >> 16740690

Targeted deletion of MKK4 in cancer cells: a detrimental phenotype manifests as decreased experimental metastasis and suggests a counterweight to the evolution of tumor-suppressor loss.

Steven C Cunningham1, Eike Gallmeier, Tomas Hucl, David A Dezentje, Eric S Calhoun, Geppino Falco, Kotb Abdelmohsen, Myriam Gorospe, Scott E Kern.   

Abstract

Tumor-suppressors have commanded attention due to the selection for their inactivating mutations in human tumors. However, relatively little is understood about the inverse, namely, that tumors do not select for a large proportion of seemingly favorable mutations in tumor-suppressor genes. This could be explained by a detrimental phenotype accruing in a cell type-specific manner to most cells experiencing a biallelic loss. For example, MKK4, a tumor suppressor gene distinguished by a remarkably consistent mutational rate across diverse tumor types and an unusually high rate of loss of heterozygosity, has the surprisingly low rate of genetic inactivation of only approximately 5%. To explore this incongruity, we engineered a somatic gene knockout of MKK4 in human cancer cells. Although the null cells resembled the wild-type cells regarding in vitro viability and proliferation in plastic dishes, there was a marked difference in a more relevant in vivo model of experimental metastasis and tumorigenesis. MKK4(-/-) clones injected i.v. produced fewer lung metastases than syngeneic MKK4-competent cells (P = 0.0034). These findings show how cell type-specific detrimental phenotypes can offer a paradoxical and yet key counterweight to the selective advantage attained by cells as they experiment with genetic null states during tumorigenesis, the resultant balance then determining the observed biallelic mutation rate for a given tumor-suppressor gene.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16740690     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  19 in total

1.  A Chemical Probe Strategy for Interrogating Inhibitor Selectivity Across the MEK Kinase Family.

Authors:  Kristine K Deibler; Rama K Mishra; Matthew R Clutter; Aleksandar Antanasijevic; Raymond Bergan; Michael Caffrey; Karl A Scheidt
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 5.100

2.  Regulation of the metastasis suppressor gene MKK4 in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Monique A Spillman; Judith Lacy; Susan K Murphy; Regina S Whitaker; Lisa Grace; Vanessa Teaberry; Jeffrey R Marks; Andrew Berchuck
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-02-05       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Association between functional polymorphisms in genes involved in the MAPK signaling pathways and cutaneous melanoma risk.

Authors:  Hongliang Liu; Li-E Wang; Zhensheng Liu; Wei V Chen; Christopher I Amos; Jeffrey E Lee; Mark M Iles; Matthew H Law; Jennifer H Barrett; Grant W Montgomery; John C Taylor; Stuart MacGregor; Anne E Cust; Julia A Newton Bishop; Nicholas K Hayward; D Timothy Bishop; Graham J Mann; Paul Affleck; Qingyi Wei
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 4.944

4.  The mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 4 has a pro-oncogenic role in skin cancer.

Authors:  Katherine G Finegan; Cathy Tournier
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  AAV-mediated gene targeting methods for human cells.

Authors:  Iram F Khan; Roli K Hirata; David W Russell
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 13.491

6.  Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of 3-Arylindazoles as Selective MEK4 Inhibitors.

Authors:  Kristine K Deibler; Gary E Schiltz; Matthew R Clutter; Rama K Mishra; Purav P Vagadia; Matthew O'Connor; Mariam Donny George; Ryan Gordon; Graham Fowler; Raymond Bergan; Karl A Scheidt
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 3.466

7.  Modeling MEK4 Kinase Inhibitors through Perturbed Electrostatic Potential Charges.

Authors:  Rama K Mishra; Kristine K Deibler; Matthew R Clutter; Purav P Vagadia; Matthew O'Connor; Gary E Schiltz; Raymond Bergan; Karl A Scheidt
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  MEK4 function, genistein treatment, and invasion of human prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Li Xu; Yongzeng Ding; William J Catalona; Ximing J Yang; Wayne F Anderson; Borko Jovanovic; Kenji Wellman; Jaqueline Killmer; Xiaoke Huang; Karl A Scheidt; R Bruce Montgomery; Raymond C Bergan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 9.  Adeno-associated virus vector integration.

Authors:  David R Deyle; David W Russell
Journal:  Curr Opin Mol Ther       Date:  2009-08

10.  The soft underbelly of tumor cells.

Authors:  Yufeng Shi; S Kyun Lim; Luis F Parada
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 25.617

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.