Literature DB >> 16740199

The evolution of egg colour and patterning in birds.

R M Kilner1.   

Abstract

Avian eggs differ so much in their colour and patterning from species to species that any attempt to account for this diversity might initially seem doomed to failure. Here I present a critical review of the literature which, when combined with the results of some comparative analyses, suggests that just a few selective agents can explain much of the variation in egg appearance. Ancestrally, bird eggs were probably white and immaculate. Ancient diversification in nest location, and hence in the clutch's vulnerability to attack by predators, can explain basic differences between bird families in egg appearance. The ancestral white egg has been retained by species whose nests are safe from attack by predators, while those that have moved to a more vulnerable nest site are now more likely to lay brown eggs, covered in speckles, just as Wallace hypothesized more than a century ago. Even blue eggs might be cryptic in a subset of nests built in vegetation. It is possible that some species have subsequently turned these ancient adaptations to new functions, for example to signal female quality, to protect eggs from damaging solar radiation, or to add structural strength to shells when calcium is in short supply. The threat of predation, together with the use of varying nest sites, appears to have increased the diversity of egg colouring seen among species within families, and among clutches within species. Brood parasites and their hosts have probably secondarily influenced the diversity of egg appearance. Each drives the evolution of the other's egg colour and patterning, as hosts attempt to avoid exploitation by rejecting odd-looking eggs from their nests, and parasites attempt to outwit their hosts by laying eggs that will escape detection. This co-evolutionary arms race has increased variation in egg appearance both within and between species, in parasites and in hosts, sometimes resulting in the evolution of egg colour polymorphisms. It has also reduced variation in egg appearance within host clutches, although the benefit thus gained by hosts is not clear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16740199     DOI: 10.1017/S1464793106007044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  67 in total

1.  The chemical basis of a signal of individual identity: shell pigment concentrations track the unique appearance of Common Murre eggs.

Authors:  Mark E Hauber; Alexander L Bond; Amy-Lee Kouwenberg; Gregory J Robertson; Erpur S Hansen; Mande Holford; Miri Dainson; Alec Luro; James Dale
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Higher-level pattern features provide additional information to birds when recognizing and rejecting parasitic eggs.

Authors:  Mary Caswell Stoddard; Benedict G Hogan; Martin Stevens; Claire N Spottiswoode
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Ultraviolet visual sensitivity in three avian lineages: paleognaths, parrots, and passerines.

Authors:  Zachary Aidala; Leon Huynen; Patricia L R Brennan; Jacob Musser; Andrew Fidler; Nicola Chong; Gabriel E Machovsky Capuska; Michael G Anderson; Amanda Talaba; David Lambert; Mark E Hauber
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Eggshell colour does not predict measures of maternal investment in eggs of Turdus thrushes.

Authors:  Phillip Cassey; John G Ewen; Tim M Blackburn; Mark E Hauber; Misha Vorobyev; N Justin Marshall
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2008-04-10

5.  A method to determine the combined effects of climate change (temperature and humidity) and eggshell thickness on water loss from bird eggs.

Authors:  L-M Veldsman; H Kylin; P Bronkhorst; I Engelbrecht; H Bouwman
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 6.  Vive la difference! Self/non-self recognition and the evolution of signatures of identity in arms races with parasites.

Authors:  Claire N Spottiswoode; Robert Busch
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Nest construction by a ground-nesting bird represents a potential trade-off between egg crypticity and thermoregulation.

Authors:  Paul M Mayer; Levica M Smith; Robert G Ford; Dustin C Watterson; Marshall D McCutchen; Mark R Ryan
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Coevolution in action: disruptive selection on egg colour in an avian brood parasite and its host.

Authors:  Canchao Yang; Wei Liang; Yan Cai; Suhua Shi; Fugo Takasu; Anders P Møller; Anton Antonov; Frode Fossøy; Arne Moksnes; Eivin Røskaft; Bård G Stokke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Variability in avian eggshell colour: a comparative study of museum eggshells.

Authors:  Phillip Cassey; Steven J Portugal; Golo Maurer; John G Ewen; Rebecca L Boulton; Mark E Hauber; Tim M Blackburn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Geographic distribution of suitable hosts explains the evolution of specialized gentes in the European cuckoo Cuculus canorus.

Authors:  Juan J Soler; Manuel Martín Vivaldi; Anders Pape Møller
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.