Literature DB >> 16738988

Converted laparoscopic colectomy: what are the consequences?

A Belizon1, C T Sardinha, M E Sher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The safety and benefits of laparoscopic colon resection are well documented. However, few reports have addressed the safety and comparative outcome of laparoscopic colon operations that necessitated conversion.
METHODS: All consecutive laparoscopic colon resections performed by a single surgeon from July 1996 to October 2003 were assessed. Data obtained from a prospective computerized database included demographics, diagnosis, reason and time to conversion, length of stay, morbidity, and mortality. Additionally, all laparoscopic-converted colectomies were then matched with open colectomies by diagnosis and severity of disease and analyzed with respect to morbidity, mortality, and clinical outcome.
RESULTS: A total of 143 laparoscopic colon resections were analyzed, 78 of which were left colon resections and 65 were right colon resections. The overall conversion rate was 19.6% (28 patients). The disease entities of the 28 converted patients were diverticulitis (16), polyps (four), Crohn's disease (three), metastatic cancer (three), and others (two). Conversion was higher in the left-sided (24 patients, 30.8%) versus right-sided (four patients, 6.1%) procedures. There were no differences regarding age, gender, and comorbidities among the laparoscopic, open, and converted groups; the median follow-up was 39 months. The median length of stay was 6, 8, and 12 days for the laparoscopic, open, and converted groups, respectively. Right-sided conversions were due to the size of the inflammatory mass in three patients and intraoperative bleeding in one patient. Left-sided conversions were due to the inflammatory process extending beyond the sigmoid colon in 12 patients, adhesions in five, obesity in four, pericolonic abscess in two, and fixed mass in one patient. Postoperative morbidity was significantly higher for laparoscopic procedures that were converted to open procedures more than 30 min into the operation. Preoperative predictors of conversion were extent of inflammatory process beyond the sigmoid colon and obesity, whereas intraoperative predictors were adhesions and bleeding.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic-converted colon resection is associated with significantly greater morbidity, particularly wound complications and greater length of hospital stay, compared to open or laparoscopic colectomies. Prompt conversion (<30 min) may reduce the overall morbidity associated with converted procedures. Furthermore, thoughtful patient selection may decrease the conversion rate and thereby prevent the inherent morbidity associated with converted procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16738988     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0553-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  21 in total

1.  Converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  P Gervaz; A Pikarsky; M Utech; M Secic; J Efron; B Belin; A Jain; S Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-11       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Wound complications of laparoscopic vs open colectomy.

Authors:  E R Winslow; J W Fleshman; E H Birnbaum; L M Brunt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Conor P Delaney; Ravi P Kiran; Anthony J Senagore; Karen Brady; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies.

Authors:  C L Bennett; S J Stryker; M R Ferreira; J Adams; R W Beart
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1997-01

5.  Laparoscopic colectomy: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  P M Falk; R W Beart; S D Wexner; A G Thorson; D G Jagelman; I C Lavery; O B Johansen; R J Fitzgibbons
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Jane C Weeks; Heidi Nelson; Shari Gelber; Daniel Sargent; Georgene Schroeder
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-01-16       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Wound infection after elective colorectal resection.

Authors:  Robert L Smith; Jamie K Bohl; Shannon T McElearney; Charles M Friel; Margaret M Barclay; Robert G Sawyer; Eugene F Foley
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy. Initial experience.

Authors:  G C Hoffman; J W Baker; C W Fitchett; J H Vansant
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  High morbidity rate after converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  K Slim; D Pezet; Y Riff; E Clark; J Chipponi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  52 in total

1.  Conversion in laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for right colon cancer: risk factors and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Jimmy C M Li; Janet F Y Lee; Simon S M Ng; Raymond Y C Yiu; Sophie S F Hon; Wing Wa Leung; Ka Lau Leung
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Elective open versus laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: a meta-analysis with the Sigma trial.

Authors:  Muhammed R S Siddiqui; Muhammed S Sajid; Kamran Khatri; Elizabeth Cheek; Mirza K Baig
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Laparoscopic management of diverticular disease.

Authors:  Jeremy M Lipman; Harry L Reynolds
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-08

4.  What is the definition of "conversion" in laparoscopic colorectal surgery?

Authors:  Sherief Shawki; Badma Bashankaev; Paula Denoya; Christina Seo; Eric G Weiss; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: why it is still not the gold standard and why it should be.

Authors:  G Romano; G Gagliardi; F Bianco; M C Parker; F Corcione
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Influence of conversion on the perioperative and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer compared with primarily open resection.

Authors:  Alexander Rickert; Florian Herrle; Fabian Doyon; Stefan Post; Peter Kienle
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Conversion during laparoscopic colorectal resections: a complication or a drawback? A systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Mariano Cesare Giglio; Valerio Celentano; Rachele Tarquini; Gaetano Luglio; Giovanni Domenico De Palma; Luigi Bucci
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Rosa M Jiménez-Rodríguez; José Manuel Díaz-Pavón; Fernando de la Portilla de Juan; Emilio Prendes-Sillero; Hisnard Cadet Dussort; Javier Padillo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Laparoscopy decreases complications for obese patients undergoing elective rectal surgery.

Authors:  Gabriela M Vargas; Eric P Sieloff; Abhishek D Parmar; Nina P Tamirisa; Hemalkumar B Mehta; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  A single training center's experience with 200 consecutive cases of diverticulitis: can all patients be approached laparoscopically?

Authors:  Kelly A Garrett; Bradley J Champagne; Brian T Valerian; David Peterson; Edward C Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.