Literature DB >> 16737394

Clinicians' judgments of clinical utility: a comparison of the DSM-IV and five-factor models.

Douglas B Samuel1, Thomas A Widiger.   

Abstract

Clinical utility, or the usefulness of a diagnostic system in clinical practice, has been identified as an important construct in proposed revisions to the diagnostic nomenclature and a significant limitation of dimensional models of personality disorder, such as the 5-factor model (FFM). Only 1 study to date has addressed explicitly the clinical utility of the FFM, and the findings suggested significant limitations. In the current study, 245 practicing psychologists described 3 historic cases using both the FFM and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association, 2000) and then rated each model on 6 aspects of clinical utility. In contrast to prior research, the psychologists in this study considered the FFM to have greater clinical utility than the existing diagnostic categories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16737394     DOI: 10.1037/0021-843X.115.2.298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol        ISSN: 0021-843X


  21 in total

1.  Can personality disorder experts recognize DSM-IV personality disorders from five-factor model descriptions of patient cases?

Authors:  Benjamin M Rottman; Nancy S Kim; Woo-Kyoung Ahn; Charles A Sanislow
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 4.384

2.  Borderline personality traits and disorder: predicting prospective patient functioning.

Authors:  Christopher J Hopwood; Mary C Zanarini
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2010-08

3.  The NEO Five-Factor Inventory: latent structure and relationships with dimensions of anxiety and depressive disorders in a large clinical sample.

Authors:  Anthony J Rosellini; Timothy A Brown
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2010-09-29

4.  Comparing personality disorder models: cross-method assessment of the FFM and DSM-IV-TR.

Authors:  Douglas B Samuel; Thomas W Widiger
Journal:  J Pers Disord       Date:  2010-12

5.  Clinicians' Use of Personality Disorder Models within a Particular Treatment Setting: A Longitudinal Comparison of Temporal Consistency and Clinical Utility.

Authors:  Douglas B Samuel; Thomas A Widiger
Journal:  Personal Ment Health       Date:  2011-02

6.  Can clinicians recognize DSM-IV personality disorders from five-factor model descriptions of patient cases?

Authors:  Benjamin M Rottman; Woo-Kyoung Ahn; Charles A Sanislow; Nancy S Kim
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 7.  A proposal for a dimensional classification system based on the shared features of the DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders: implications for assessment and treatment.

Authors:  Timothy A Brown; David H Barlow
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2009-09

Review 8.  On the value of homogeneous constructs for construct validation, theory testing, and the description of psychopathology.

Authors:  Gregory T Smith; Denis M McCarthy; Tamika C B Zapolski
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2009-09

9.  A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: a facet level analysis.

Authors:  Douglas B Samuel; Thomas A Widiger
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-07-04

10.  Incremental validity of the PID-5 in relation to the five factor model and traditional polythetic personality criteria of the DSM-5.

Authors:  J Christopher Fowler; Michelle A Patriquin; Alok Madan; Jon G Allen; B Christopher Frueh; John M Oldham
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 4.035

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.