Literature DB >> 16737357

Implications of direct and indirect range restriction for meta-analysis methods and findings.

John E Hunter1, Frank L Schmidt, Huy Le.   

Abstract

Range restriction in most data sets is indirect, but the meta-analysis methods used to date have applied the correction for direct range restriction to data in which range restriction is indirect. The authors show that this results in substantial undercorrections for the effects of range restriction, and they present meta-analysis methods for making accurate corrections when range restriction is indirect. Applying these methods to a well-known large-sample empirical database, the authors estimate that previous meta-analyses have underestimated the correlation between general mental ability and job performance by about 25%, indicating that this is potentially an important methodological issue in meta-analysis in general.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16737357     DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9010


  21 in total

1.  An Improved Correction for Range Restricted Correlations Under Extreme, Monotonic Quadratic Nonlinearity and Heteroscedasticity.

Authors:  Steven Andrew Culpepper
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Designing Intervention Studies: Selected Populations, Range Restrictions, and Statistical Power.

Authors:  Jeremy Miciak; W Pat Taylor; Karla K Stuebing; Jack M Fletcher; Sharon Vaughn
Journal:  J Res Educ Eff       Date:  2015-11-23

Review 3.  Perceived stress and telomere length: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and methodologic considerations for advancing the field.

Authors:  Maya B Mathur; Elissa Epel; Shelley Kind; Manisha Desai; Christine G Parks; Dale P Sandler; Nayer Khazeni
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 7.217

4.  Are we under-estimating the association between autism symptoms?: The importance of considering simultaneous selection when using samples of individuals who meet diagnostic criteria for an autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Aja Louise Murray; Karen McKenzie; Renate Kuenssberg; Michael O'Donnell
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2014-11

5.  Have Standard Formulas Correcting Correlations for Range Restriction Been Adequately Tested?: Minor Sampling Distribution Quirks Distort Them.

Authors:  Wendy Johnson; Ian J Deary; Thomas J Bouchard
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 2.821

Review 6.  Validity and Reliability of IPAQ-SF and GPAQ for Assessing Sedentary Behaviour in Adults in the European Union: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kaja Meh; Gregor Jurak; Maroje Sorić; Paulo Rocha; Vedrana Sember
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  A Missing Data Approach to Correct for Direct and Indirect Range Restrictions with a Dichotomous Criterion: A Simulation Study.

Authors:  Andreas Pfaffel; Marlene Kollmayer; Barbara Schober; Christiane Spiel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Academic Backbone: longitudinal continuities in educational achievement from secondary school and medical school to MRCP(UK) and the specialist register in UK medical students and doctors.

Authors:  I C McManus; Katherine Woolf; Jane Dacre; Elisabeth Paice; Chris Dewberry
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 8.775

9.  Construct-level predictive validity of educational attainment and intellectual aptitude tests in medical student selection: meta-regression of six UK longitudinal studies.

Authors:  I C McManus; Chris Dewberry; Sandra Nicholson; Jonathan S Dowell; Katherine Woolf; Henry W W Potts
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  The UKCAT-12 study: educational attainment, aptitude test performance, demographic and socio-economic contextual factors as predictors of first year outcome in a cross-sectional collaborative study of 12 UK medical schools.

Authors:  I C McManus; Chris Dewberry; Sandra Nicholson; Jonathan S Dowell
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.