Literature DB >> 16736369

Spatial equity in facilities providing low- or no-fee screening mammography in Chicago neighborhoods.

Shannon N Zenk1, Elizabeth Tarlov, Jiaming Sun.   

Abstract

Recent research suggests living in an economically disadvantaged neighborhood is associated with decreased likelihood of undergoing mammography and increased risk of late-stage breast cancer diagnosis. Long distances and travel times to facilities offering low- or no-fee mammography may be important barriers to adherence to mammography screening recommendations for women living in economically disadvantaged urban neighborhoods, in which African-Americans are disproportionately represented. The purpose of this study was to examine whether the spatial distribution of facilities providing low- or no-fee screening mammography in Chicago, Illinois, is equitable on the basis of neighborhood socioeconomic and racial characteristics. We found that distance and travel times via automobile and public transportation to facilities generally decrease as neighborhood poverty increases. However, we also found that the strength of the association between neighborhood poverty level and two of the spatial accessibility measures-distance and public transportation travel time-is less strong in African-American neighborhoods. Among neighborhoods with the greatest need for facilities (i.e., neighborhoods with the highest proportions of residents in poverty), African-American neighborhoods have longer travel distances and public transportation travel times than neighborhoods with proportionately fewer African-American residents. Thus, it appears that the spatial accessibility of low- and no-fee mammography services is inequitable in Chicago. In view of persistent social disparities in health such as breast cancer outcomes, these findings suggest it is important for researchers to examine the spatial distribution of health resources by both the socioeconomic and racial characteristics of urban neighborhoods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16736369      PMCID: PMC2527168          DOI: 10.1007/s11524-005-9023-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urban Health        ISSN: 1099-3460            Impact factor:   3.671


  43 in total

1.  Is travel distance a barrier to veterans' use of VA hospitals for medical surgical care?

Authors:  C Mooney; J Zwanziger; C S Phibbs; S Schmitt
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Socioeconomic status and breast carcinoma survival in four racial/ethnic groups: a population-based study.

Authors:  Cynthia D O'Malley; Gem M Le; Sally L Glaser; Sarah J Shema; Dee W West
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Debbie Saslow; Kimberly Andrews Sawyer; Wylie Burke; Mary E Costanza; W Phil Evans; Roger S Foster; Edward Hendrick; Harmon J Eyre; Steven Sener
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Physician accessibility: an urban case study of pediatric providers.

Authors:  Mark F Guagliardo; Cynthia R Ronzio; Ivan Cheung; Elizabeth Chacko; Jill G Joseph
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.078

5.  Targeting the underserved for breast and cervical cancer screening: the utility of ecological analysis using the National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  B L Wells; J W Horm
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  ACOG practice bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 42, April 2003. Breast cancer screening.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Racial differences in breast carcinoma survival.

Authors:  S A Joslyn; M M West
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Judith Swan; Nancy Breen; Ralph J Coates; Barbara K Rimer; Nancy C Lee
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Perceptions of insurance coverage for screening mammography among women in need of screening.

Authors:  Ann Scheck McAlearney; Katherine W Reeves; Cathy Tatum; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Validation of recall of breast and cervical cancer screening by women in an ethnically diverse population.

Authors:  Stephen J McPhee; Tung T Nguyen; Sarah J Shema; Bang Nguyen; Carol Somkin; Phuong Vo; Rena Pasick
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.018

View more
  30 in total

1.  Significance of increasing poverty levels for determining late-stage breast cancer diagnosis in 1990 and 2000.

Authors:  Janis Barry; Nancy Breen; Michael Barrett
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Late-Stage Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Health Care Access in Illinois.

Authors:  Fahui Wang; Sara McLafferty; Veronica Escamilla; Lan Luo
Journal:  Prof Geogr       Date:  2008-02

3.  Disparity in Breast Cancer Late Stage at Diagnosis in Missouri: Does Rural Versus Urban Residence Matter?

Authors:  Faustine Williams; Emmanuel Thompson
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2015-06-20

4.  Neighborhood Predictors of Mammography Barriers Among US-Based Latinas.

Authors:  Yamile Molina; Jesse J Plascak; Donald L Patrick; Sonia Bishop; Gloria D Coronado; Shirley A A Beresford
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2016-04-08

5.  Time and distance barriers to mammography facilities in the Atlanta metropolitan area.

Authors:  Lucy A Peipins; Shannon Graham; Randall Young; Brian Lewis; Stephanie Foster; Barry Flanagan; Andrew Dent
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2011-08

6.  Breast cancer stage at diagnosis and geographic access to mammography screening (New Hampshire, 1998-2004).

Authors:  Maria O Celaya; Ethan M Berke; Tracy L Onega; Jiang Gui; Bruce L Riddle; Sai S Cherala; Judy R Rees
Journal:  Rural Remote Health       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 1.759

7.  Are HPV vaccination services accessible to high-risk communities? A spatial analysis of HPV-associated cancer and Chlamydia rates and safety-net clinics.

Authors:  Jennifer Tsui; Hector P Rodriguez; Gilbert C Gee; Loraine A Escobedo; Gerald F Kominski; Roshan Bastani
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Patient Navigation in Medically Underserved Areas study design: A trial with implications for efficacy, effect modification, and full continuum assessment.

Authors:  Yamile Molina; Anne E Glassgow; Sage J Kim; Nerida M Berrios; Heather Pauls; Karriem S Watson; Julie S Darnell; Elizabeth A Calhoun
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 2.226

9.  Sociodemographic Characteristics, Distance to the Clinic, and Breast Cancer Screening Results.

Authors:  Seijeoung Kim; Beverly Chukwudozie; Elizabeth Calhoun
Journal:  J Health Dispar Res Pract       Date:  2013

10.  Breast and cervical cancer screening among women in metropolitan areas of the United States by county-level commuting time to work and use of public transportation, 2004 and 2006.

Authors:  Steven S Coughlin; Jessica King
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.