Literature DB >> 16736074

College student drinking, attitudes toward risks, and drinking consequences.

Stephen L Benton1, Sherry A Benton, Ronald G Downey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether college students' attitudes toward risks explain significant variance in drinking consequences beyond gender, alcohol use, and self-protective strategies.
METHOD: A derivation sample (N=276; 52% women) and a replication sample (N=216; 52% women) of undergraduate students completed the Campus Alcohol Survey (CAS) and the Attitudes Toward Risks Scale (ATRS).
RESULTS: Scores on the ATRS correlated positively with students' self-reported typical number of drinks and negative drinking consequences (p<.001). Hierarchical regression analyses indicated that ATRS scores explained significant variance in negative drinking consequences beyond college students' gender, typical number of drinks, and use of protective strategies (p<.001). Furthermore, a significant Drinks x ATRS interaction revealed that heavy-drinking students who scored high on the ATRS experienced the most harm from drinking (p<.01). Students with high-risk attitudes showed a stronger link between typical number of drinks and negative drinking consequences.
CONCLUSIONS: Even when controlling for students' gender, alcohol use, and protective strategies, college students' attitudes toward risks explain significant variance in drinking consequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16736074     DOI: 10.15288/jsa.2006.67.543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stud Alcohol        ISSN: 0096-882X


  11 in total

1.  Development and validation of the college drinking influences survey.

Authors:  Celia B Fisher; Adam L Fried; Andrea Anushko
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec

2.  Weighing the Pros and Cons of Using Alcohol Protective Behavioral Strategies: A Qualitative Examination among College Students.

Authors:  Adrian J Bravo; Matthew R Pearson; Leah E Stevens; James M Henson
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 2.164

3.  Changes in protective behavioral strategies and alcohol use among college students.

Authors:  Matthew P Martens; Jessica L Martin; Andrew K Littlefield; James G Murphy; M Dolores Cimini
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Use of Alcohol Protective Behavioral Strategies as a Moderator of the Alcohol Use-Consequences Relationship: Evidence from Multiple Replications.

Authors:  Kevin S Montes; Matthew R Pearson; Adrian J Bravo
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 2.164

5.  Clarifying observed relationships between protective behavioral strategies and alcohol outcomes: The importance of response options.

Authors:  Abby L Braitman; James M Henson; Kate B Carey
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2014-09-01

6.  Drink less or drink slower: the effects of instruction on alcohol consumption and drinking control strategy use.

Authors:  Dawn E Sugarman; Kate B Carey
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2009-12

7.  An Examination of the Mediational Effects of Cognitive and Attitudinal Factors of a Parent Intervention to Reduce College Drinking.

Authors:  Rob Turrisi; Caitlin Abar; Kimberly A Mallett; James Jaccard
Journal:  J Appl Soc Psychol       Date:  2010-10-01

8.  The association between protective behavioral strategies and alcohol-related problems: An examination of race and gender differences among college drinkers.

Authors:  Nickeisha Clarke; Su-Young Kim; Anne E Ray; Helene R White; Yang Jiao; Eun-Young Mun
Journal:  J Ethn Subst Abuse       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 1.507

Review 9.  Use of alcohol protective behavioral strategies among college students: a critical review.

Authors:  Matthew R Pearson
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2013-08-23

10.  How is an electronic screening and brief intervention tool on alcohol use received in a student population? A qualitative and quantitative evaluation.

Authors:  Jessica Fraeyman; Paul Van Royen; Bart Vriesacker; Leen De Mey; Guido Van Hal
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.