Literature DB >> 16735521

Patients' perceptions of cholesterol, cardiovascular disease risk, and risk communication strategies.

Roberta E Goldman1, Donna R Parker, Charles B Eaton, Jeffrey M Borkan, Robert Gramling, Rebecca T Cover, David K Ahern.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Despite some recent improvement in knowledge about cholesterol in the United States, patient adherence to cholesterol treatment recommendations remains suboptimal. We undertook a qualitative study that explored patients' perceptions of cholesterol and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and their reactions to 3 strategies for communicating CVD risk.
METHODS: We conducted 7 focus groups in New England using open-ended questions and visual risk communication prompts. The multidisciplinary study team performed qualitative content analysis through immersion/crystallization processes and analyzing coded reports using NVivo qualitative coding software.
RESULTS: All participants were aware that "high cholesterol" levels adversely affect health. Many had, however, inadequate knowledge about hypercholesterolemia and CVD risk, and few knew their cholesterol numbers. Many assumed they had been tested and their cholesterol concentrations were healthy, even if their physicians had not mentioned it. Standard visual representations showing statistical probabilities of risk were assessed as confusing and uninspiring. A strategy that provides a cardiovascular risk-adjusted age was evaluated as clear, memorable, relevant, and potentially capable of motivating people to make healthful changes. A few participants in each focus group were concerned that a cardiovascular risk-adjusted age that was greater than chronological age would frighten patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Complex explanations about cholesterol and CVD risk appear to be insufficient for motivating behavior change. A cardiovascular risk-adjusted age calculator is one strategy that may engage patients in recognizing their CVD risk and, when accompanied by information about risk reduction, may be helpful in communicating risk to patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16735521      PMCID: PMC1479442          DOI: 10.1370/afm.534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN: 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.166


  37 in total

Review 1.  Treating people with information: an analysis and review of approaches to communicating health risk information.

Authors:  A J Rothman; M T Kiviniemi
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1999

Review 2.  Explaining risks: turning numerical data into meaningful pictures.

Authors:  Adrian Edwards; Glyn Elwyn; Al Mulley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-06

3.  Perceptions of cardiovascular risk among patients with hypertension or diabetes.

Authors:  Bernard D Frijling; Claudia M Lobo; Inge M Keus; Kathleen M Jenks; Reinier P Akkermans; Marlies E J L Hulscher; Ad Prins; Johannes C van der Wouden; Richard P T M Grol
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2004-01

4.  An updated coronary risk profile. A statement for health professionals.

Authors:  K M Anderson; P W Wilson; P M Odell; W B Kannel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Change in public perspective on cholesterol and heart disease. Results from two national surveys.

Authors:  B Schucker; K Bailey; J T Heimbach; M E Mattson; J T Wittes; C M Haines; D J Gordon; J A Cutler; V S Keating; R S Goor
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-12-25       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Summary of the second report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel II)

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-06-16       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Health beliefs and attitudes toward the prevention of osteoporosis in older women.

Authors:  C Hsieh; K D Novielli; J J Diamond; D Cheruva
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Factors that influence personal perceptions of the risk of an acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  H Meischke; D E Sellers; M L Robbins; D C Goff; M R Daya; A Meshack; J Taylor; J Zapka; M M Hand
Journal:  Behav Med       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.104

9.  Assessing values for health: numeracy matters.

Authors:  S Woloshin; L M Schwartz; M Moncur; S Gabriel; A N Tosteson
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Cholesterol knowledge and practices among patients compared with physician management in a university primary care setting.

Authors:  C Whiteside; J A Robbins
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.018

View more
  44 in total

1.  Communicating risk using absolute risk reduction or prolongation of life formats: cluster-randomised trial in general practice.

Authors:  Charlotte Gry Harmsen; Ivar Sønbø Kristiansen; Pia Veldt Larsen; Jørgen Nexøe; Henrik Støvring; Dorte Gyrd-Hansen; Jesper Bo Nielsen; Adrian Edwards; Dorte Ejg Jarbøl
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  On TRACK: medical research must consider context and complexity.

Authors:  Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Long-Term Risk of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in US Adults With the Familial Hypercholesterolemia Phenotype.

Authors:  Amanda M Perak; Hongyan Ning; Sarah D de Ferranti; Holly C Gooding; John T Wilkins; Donald M Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Understanding uncertainty.

Authors:  David J Spiegelhalter
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  A French update on the Self-Efficacy Measure for Sleep Apnea (SEMSA) to assess continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) use.

Authors:  Jean-Arthur Micoulaud-Franchi; Olivier Coste; Stéphanie Bioulac; Kelly Guichard; Pierre-Jean Monteyrol; Imad Ghorayeb; Terri E Weaver; Sébastien Weibel; Pierre Philip
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 2.816

6.  Using body mass index data in the electronic health record to calculate cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  Beverly B Green; Melissa L Anderson; Andrea J Cook; Sheryl Catz; Paul A Fishman; Jennifer B McClure; Robert Reid
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 7.  Evolution of lipid management guidelines: evidence might set you free.

Authors:  N John Bosomworth
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 8.  Cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  Rupert A Payne
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Perceptions of cardiovascular health in underserved communities.

Authors:  Lucinda L Bryant; Nancy P Chin; Lesley A Cottrell; Joyce M Duckles; I Diana Fernandez; D Marcela Garces; Thomas C Keyserling; Colleen R McMilin; Karen E Peters; Carmen D Samuel-Hodge; Shin-Ping Tu; Maihan B Vu; Annette L Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Absolute risk representation in cardiovascular disease prevention: comprehension and preferences of health care consumers and general practitioners involved in a focus group study.

Authors:  Sophie Hill; Janet Spink; Dominique Cadilhac; Adrian Edwards; Caroline Kaufman; Sophie Rogers; Rebecca Ryan; Andrew Tonkin
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.