BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using a two-piece implant system in a non-submerged procedure and to study the impact of the microgap between the implant and abutment. METHODS:Sixty edentulous patients (Cawood Class V-VI) participated in this study. After randomization, 20 patients received two two-piece implants placed in a non-submerged procedure, 20 patients received two two-piece implants placed in the traditional submerged procedure, and 20 patients were treated with two one-piece dental implants placed in the traditional non-submerged procedure. The implants were placed in the mandible for overdenture treatment. A standardized clinical evaluation was performed and radiographs were taken immediately after denture insertion and yearly up to 5 years. Peri-implant samples were collected 12, 36, and 60 months after loading with sterile paper points and analyzed for the presence of putative periodontal pathogens using culture techniques. RESULTS: One two-piece implant of the non-submerged group and one two-piece implant of the submerged group were lost after 6 and 12 months, respectively. After 5 years of functioning, no significant clinical, radiological, or microbiological differences were found between the three groups. No association was found between the level of the microgap and the amount of bone loss. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that dental implants designed for a submerged implantation procedure can also be used in a non-submerged procedure and may be as predictable as when used in a submerged procedure or as one-piece implants. The microgap at the crestal level in two-piece implants does not appear to have an adverse effect on the amount of peri-implant bone loss.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using a two-piece implant system in a non-submerged procedure and to study the impact of the microgap between the implant and abutment. METHODS: Sixty edentulouspatients (Cawood Class V-VI) participated in this study. After randomization, 20 patients received two two-piece implants placed in a non-submerged procedure, 20 patients received two two-piece implants placed in the traditional submerged procedure, and 20 patients were treated with two one-piece dental implants placed in the traditional non-submerged procedure. The implants were placed in the mandible for overdenture treatment. A standardized clinical evaluation was performed and radiographs were taken immediately after denture insertion and yearly up to 5 years. Peri-implant samples were collected 12, 36, and 60 months after loading with sterile paper points and analyzed for the presence of putative periodontal pathogens using culture techniques. RESULTS: One two-piece implant of the non-submerged group and one two-piece implant of the submerged group were lost after 6 and 12 months, respectively. After 5 years of functioning, no significant clinical, radiological, or microbiological differences were found between the three groups. No association was found between the level of the microgap and the amount of bone loss. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that dental implants designed for a submerged implantation procedure can also be used in a non-submerged procedure and may be as predictable as when used in a submerged procedure or as one-piece implants. The microgap at the crestal level in two-piece implants does not appear to have an adverse effect on the amount of peri-implant bone loss.
Authors: Marco Esposito; Maria Gabriella Grusovin; Yun Shane Chew; Paul Coulthard; Helen V Worthington Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-05-23
Authors: Greison Rabelo de Oliveira; Leandro Pozzer; Lucas Cavalieri-Pereira; Paulo Hemerson de Moraes; Sergio Olate; Jose Ricardo de Albergaría Barbosa Journal: J Periodontal Implant Sci Date: 2012-12-31 Impact factor: 2.614
Authors: Mariana Ribeiro de Moraes Rego; Marcelo Ferreira Torres; Luiz Carlos Santiago; Ronaldo Lira-Junior; Eduardo José Veras Lourenço; Daniel de Moraes Telles; Carlos Marcelo Figueredo Journal: J Oral Microbiol Date: 2015-10-23 Impact factor: 5.474