Literature DB >> 16732690

A comparative review of apomorphine formulations for erectile dysfunction : recommendations for use in the elderly.

Alberto Briganti1, Felix K-H Chun, Andrea Salonia, Giuseppe Zanni, Federico Dehò, Luigi Barbieri, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Patrizio Rigatti, Francesco Montorsi.   

Abstract

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common medical condition that affects the sexual life of millions of men worldwide. First-line oral therapy for ED includes the use of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (sildenafil, tadalafil and vardenafil) and sublingual apomorphine. Apomorphine is a dopamine D(1) and D(2) receptor agonist that has been approved for marketing in Europe. Different apomorphine formulations have been tested, such as sublingual, subcutaneous and intranasal. However, the sublingual formulation has shown the best results in terms of efficacy, safety and tolerability, especially the 2mg and 3mg doses. Although clinical studies of the efficacy and tolerability of apomorphine sublingual (SL) have included older patients, who are more likely to have ED, no study has specifically assessed the efficacy and tolerability of different doses of apomorphine SL in aging men. Therefore, a MEDLINE search was conducted from January 1987 to November 2005 to identify studies of the efficacy, safety (in particular cardiovascular safety) and tolerability of different apomorphine formulations and doses as treatments for ED in the subcohort of aging men. On the basis of the most recent peer-reviewed publications, the first part of this article critically evaluates data regarding the epidemiology of ED in the aging population. The second part of the article focuses on the mechanism of action and pharmacokinetics of apomorphine both in the general and the elderly population. Finally, a critical analysis of the efficacy and safety of different apomorphine formulations and doses for the treatment of ED is reported. Apomorphine represents a first-line oral treatment for ED. Available formulations include only sublingual administration. Few studies have assessed the efficacy and safety of apomorphine in the elderly population. However, in clinical practice, older patients with multiple vascular risk factors and systematic vascular damage show poor overall response to apomorphine SL for the treatment of ED.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16732690     DOI: 10.2165/00002512-200623040-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs Aging        ISSN: 1170-229X            Impact factor:   3.923


  45 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy of apomorphine SL in erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  V G Mirone; C G Stief
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 2.  Intranasal apomorphine. Nastech Pharmaceutical.

Authors:  Muammer Kendirci; Wayne J G Hellstrom
Journal:  IDrugs       Date:  2004-05

3.  Effect of apomorphine on penile tumescence in men with psychogenic impotence.

Authors:  R T Segraves; M Bari; K Segraves; P Spirnak
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Erectile and ejaculatory dysfunction in a community-based sample of men 50 to 78 years old: prevalence, concern, and relation to sexual activity.

Authors:  M H Blanker; J L Bosch; F P Groeneveld; A M Bohnen; A Prins; S Thomas; W C Hop
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Frequency of intercourse in men.

Authors:  C K Pearlman; L I Kobashi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1972-02       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Prospective, randomized, crossover comparison of sublingual apomorphine (3 mg) with oral sildenafil (50 mg) for male erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  C Pavone; F Curto; G Anello; V Serretta; P L Almasio; M Pavone-Macaluso
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Cardiovascular safety of sublingual apomorphine in patients on stable doses of oral antihypertensive agents and nitrates.

Authors:  T C Fagan; S Buttler; T Marbury; A Taylor; A Edmonds
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Incidence of erectile dysfunction in men 40 to 69 years old: results from a population-based cohort study in Brazil.

Authors:  Edson Duarte Moreira; Carlos Fernando Lisboa Lbo; Agla Diament; Alfredo Nicolosi; Dale B Glasser
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  A comparative, crossover study of the efficacy and safety of sildenafil and apomorphine in men with evidence of arteriogenic erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  P Perimenis; K Gyftopoulos; K Giannitsas; S A Markou; I Tsota; A Chrysanthopoulou; A Athanasopoulos; G Barbalias
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.896

10.  Apomorphine: clinical studies on erectile impotence and yawning.

Authors:  S Lal; Y Tesfaye; J X Thavundayil; T R Thompson; M E Kiely; N P Nair; A Grassino; B Dubrovsky
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 5.067

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Dopamine dysregulation syndrome: an overview of its epidemiology, mechanisms and management.

Authors:  Sean S O'Sullivan; Andrew H Evans; Andrew J Lees
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.749

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.