Literature DB >> 11589843

Cardiovascular safety of sublingual apomorphine in patients on stable doses of oral antihypertensive agents and nitrates.

T C Fagan1, S Buttler, T Marbury, A Taylor, A Edmonds.   

Abstract

Sublingual (SL) apomorphine (2 to 6 mg) has been shown to be effective for treatment of male erectile dysfunction. Many patients with erectile dysfunction are also being treated for systemic hypertension and/or cardiovascular disease. In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial, SL apomorphine 5 mg and placebo were administered on alternate days to 162 men who were on long-term therapy (> or =4 weeks) with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta blockers, diuretics, calcium channel blockers, alpha(1) blockers, or short- or long-acting nitrates. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured before and after dosing; cardiac rhythm was recorded by 4-hour Holter monitoring. The only potentially clinically significant interactions between SL apomorphine and the antihypertensive agents or short-acting nitrates were greater orthostatic decreases in systolic blood pressure in the alpha-blocker and calcium channel blocker groups (-10 and -6 mm Hg vs placebo, respectively). Administration of SL apomorphine after dosing with long-acting nitrates resulted in significant decreases in blood pressure when patients were standing (mean systolic change, -5 to -9 mm Hg 30 to 60 minutes postdose, p <0.05; mean diastolic change, -3 to -4 mm Hg 50 to 60 minutes postdose, p <0.05). The most common adverse events with SL apomorphine were dizziness, nausea, and headache. Syncope occurred in 1 patient in the beta-blocker group; symptomatic hypotension occurred in 2 patients each in the short- and long-acting nitrate groups. Thus, in patients receiving common antihypertensive agents and short-acting nitrates, as well as in most patients receiving long-acting nitrates, SL apomorphine at higher than recommended doses produced no clinically significant changes in heart rate or blood pressure greater than changes seen with SL apomorphine alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11589843     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01847-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  3 in total

Review 1.  A comparative review of apomorphine formulations for erectile dysfunction : recommendations for use in the elderly.

Authors:  Alberto Briganti; Felix K-H Chun; Andrea Salonia; Giuseppe Zanni; Federico Dehò; Luigi Barbieri; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  A comparative review of the options for treatment of erectile dysfunction: which treatment for which patient?

Authors:  Konstantinos Hatzimouratidis; Dimitrios G Hatzichristou
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Pharmacological Insights into the Use of Apomorphine in Parkinson's Disease: Clinical Relevance.

Authors:  Manon Auffret; Sophie Drapier; Marc Vérin
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.859

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.