BACKGROUND: The lipophilicity of propofol has required dispersion in a soybean macroemulsion. The authors hypothesized that the anesthetic properties of propofol are preserved when reformulated as a transparent microemulsion rather than as a turbid macroemulsion and that the dose-response relation can be selectively modified by altering the microemulsion's surfactant type and concentration. METHODS: Microemulsions of propofol were formulated using purified poloxamer 188 (3%, 5%, 7%), and sodium salt of fatty acids (C(8), C(10), C(12)) in saline and characterized using ternary/binary diagrams, particle sizing, and stability upon dilution. Rats received propofol (10 mg . kg(-1) . min(-1)) as either a microemulsion or a conventional macroemulsion to determine these end points: induction (dose; stunned; loss of lash reflex, righting reflex, withdrawal to toe pinch) and recovery (recovery of lash, righting, withdrawal reflexes). After a 14-day recovery period, rats were crossed over into the opposite experimental limb. RESULTS: Forty-eight microemulsions (diameter, 11.9-47.7 nm) were formulated. Longer carbon chain length led to a marked increase in the volume of diluent necessary to break these microemulsions. All rats experienced anesthetic induction with successful recovery, although significantly greater doses of propofol were required to induce anesthesia with microemulsions irrespective of surfactant concentration or type than with macroemulsions. The sodium salt of C10 fatty acid microemulsion required the greatest dose and longest time for anesthetic induction. CONCLUSION: Propofol microemulsions cause induction in rats similar to that from macroemulsions. The surfactant concentration and type markedly affect the spontaneous destabilization and anesthetic properties of microemulsions, a phenomenon suggesting a mechanism whereby dose-response relation can be selectively modified.
BACKGROUND: The lipophilicity of propofol has required dispersion in a soybean macroemulsion. The authors hypothesized that the anesthetic properties of propofol are preserved when reformulated as a transparent microemulsion rather than as a turbid macroemulsion and that the dose-response relation can be selectively modified by altering the microemulsion's surfactant type and concentration. METHODS: Microemulsions of propofol were formulated using purified poloxamer 188 (3%, 5%, 7%), and sodium salt of fatty acids (C(8), C(10), C(12)) in saline and characterized using ternary/binary diagrams, particle sizing, and stability upon dilution. Rats received propofol (10 mg . kg(-1) . min(-1)) as either a microemulsion or a conventional macroemulsion to determine these end points: induction (dose; stunned; loss of lash reflex, righting reflex, withdrawal to toe pinch) and recovery (recovery of lash, righting, withdrawal reflexes). After a 14-day recovery period, rats were crossed over into the opposite experimental limb. RESULTS: Forty-eight microemulsions (diameter, 11.9-47.7 nm) were formulated. Longer carbon chain length led to a marked increase in the volume of diluent necessary to break these microemulsions. All rats experienced anesthetic induction with successful recovery, although significantly greater doses of propofol were required to induce anesthesia with microemulsions irrespective of surfactant concentration or type than with macroemulsions. The sodium salt of C10 fatty acid microemulsion required the greatest dose and longest time for anesthetic induction. CONCLUSION:Propofol microemulsions cause induction in rats similar to that from macroemulsions. The surfactant concentration and type markedly affect the spontaneous destabilization and anesthetic properties of microemulsions, a phenomenon suggesting a mechanism whereby dose-response relation can be selectively modified.
Authors: Timothy E Morey; Manoj Varshney; Jason A Flint; Surender Rajasekaran; Dinesh O Shah; Donn M Dennis Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2004 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Karen S Blesch; Ronald Gieschke; Yuko Tsukamoto; Bruno G Reigner; Hans U Burger; Jean-Louis Steimer Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Timothy E Morey; Jerome H Modell; Dushyant Shekhawat; Dinesh O Shah; Brian Klatt; George P Thomas; Frank A Kero; Matthew M Booth; Donn M Dennis Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Timothy E Morey; Jerome H Modell; Jorge E Garcia; Michael Bewernitz; Hartmut Derendorf; Manoj Varshney; Nikolaus Gravenstein; Dinesh O Shah; Donn M Dennis Journal: Biopharm Drug Dispos Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 1.627
Authors: François Ravenelle; Sandra Gori; Dorothée Le Garrec; David Lessard; Laibin Luo; Dana Palusova; J Robert Sneyd; Damon Smith Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2007-11-21 Impact factor: 4.200