Literature DB >> 16731448

Acceptability of lower glycemic index foods in the diabetes camp setting.

Tonja R Nansel1, Lauren Gellar, Linda Zeitzoff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the acceptability of lower glycemic index (GI) foods served at diabetes camp.
DESIGN: Crossover design of standard and lower GI menus.
SETTING: Three consecutive 5-day diabetes camp sessions. PARTICIPANTS: 140 youth, age 7-16, with type 1 or 2 diabetes. INTERVENTION: A standard camp cycle menu was reformulated to include 2 1/2 days of standard foods and 2 1/2 days of lower GI foods. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Youth provided satisfaction ratings after meals and snacks using measures designed for this study. Observations of food consumption were conducted on a random sample of youth for each meal. ANALYSIS: Descriptive analyses and t-tests were conducted to assess differences in satisfaction with and consumption of standard and lower GI foods.
RESULTS: Lower GI foods served at dinner and for snacks received satisfaction ratings equal to standard foods (dinner: 3.68 lower GI versus 3.79 standard, P = .30; snacks: 3.74 lower GI versus 3.79 standard, P = .60). Lower GI foods served at breakfast and lunch received lower, though very acceptable, ratings (breakfast: 3.76 lower GI versus 4.04 standard, P < .01; lunch: 3.64 lower GI versus 3.88 standard, P = .01). Consumption of all meals was acceptable. No differences occurred in the frequency of high or low blood sugars between standard and lower GI days. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Higher quality carbohydrates may be provided to youth in institutional settings while maintaining sufficient levels of acceptability; specific findings are instructive for designing efforts to increase their consumption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16731448      PMCID: PMC2367101          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2006.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav        ISSN: 1499-4046            Impact factor:   3.045


  31 in total

1.  Recommendations for the nutritional management of patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors: 
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  "Pass the ketchup, please": familiar flavors increase children's willingness to taste novel foods.

Authors:  P Pliner; C Stallberg-White
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.868

3.  Evidence-based nutrition principles and recommendations for the treatment and prevention of diabetes and related complications.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 4.  Glycemic index and load-dynamic dietary guidelines in the context of diseases.

Authors:  Paolo C Colombani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2004-12-30

5.  Glycemic index in the diet of European outpatients with type 1 diabetes: relations to glycated hemoglobin and serum lipids.

Authors:  A E Buyken; M Toeller; G Heitkamp; B Karamanos; R Rottiers; M Muggeo; J H Fuller
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 6.  The relevance of the glycaemic index to our understanding of dietary carbohydrates.

Authors:  G Frost; A Dornhorst
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.359

7.  Randomised controlled trial of primary school based intervention to reduce risk factors for obesity.

Authors:  P Sahota; M C Rudolf; R Dixey; A J Hill; J H Barth; J Cade
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-11-03

8.  Impact of a school-based interdisciplinary intervention on diet and physical activity among urban primary school children: eat well and keep moving.

Authors:  S L Gortmaker; L W Cheung; K E Peterson; G Chomitz; J H Cradle; H Dart; M K Fox; R B Bullock; A M Sobol; G Colditz; A E Field; N Laird
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  1999-09

9.  US adolescent food intake trends from 1965 to 1996.

Authors:  C Cavadini; A M Siega-Riz; B M Popkin
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  Effect of low-glycemic-index dietary advice on dietary quality and food choice in children with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Heather R Gilbertson; Anne W Thorburn; Jennie C Brand-Miller; Patty Chondros; George A Werther
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.045

View more
  4 in total

1.  Associations of food preferences and household food availability with dietary intake and quality in youth with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  L M Lipsky; T R Nansel; D L Haynie; S N Mehta; L M B Laffel
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 3.868

2.  Whole grain and legume acceptability among youths with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Lauren Gellar; Alisha J Rovner; Tonja R Nansel
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 2.140

Review 3.  Perceived barriers to application of glycaemic index: valid concerns or lost in translation?

Authors:  Shannan M Grant; Thomas M S Wolever
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 6.706

4.  Higher Carbohydrate Amount and Lower Glycemic Index Increase Hunger, Diet Satisfaction, and Heartburn in Overweight and Obese Adults in the OmniCarb Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Yingfei Wu; Stephen P Juraschek; Jiun-Ruey Hu; Noel T Mueller; Lawrence J Appel; Cheryl A M Anderson; Edgar R Miller
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 4.687

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.