Literature DB >> 16731428

Application of the 1994 WHO classification to populations other than postmenopausal Caucasian women: the 2005 ISCD Official Positions.

William D Leslie1, Robert A Adler, Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan, Anthony B Hodsman, David L Kendler, Michael McClung, Paul D Miller, Nelson B Watts.   

Abstract

In 2003, the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) developed Official Positions regarding the applicability of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of bone mineral density to populations other than postmenopausal women. However, these prior Official Positions do not fully address bone mineral density reporting in females prior to menopause, men, and non-whites. During the 2005 ISCD Position Development Conference, members of the ISCD Expert Panel in conjunction with the ISCD Scientific Advisory Committee re-addressed these topics and, based upon stringent reviews of best available data, developed ISCD Official Positions that provide greater specificity and clarification with respect to the following: (1) the utility of the term 'osteopenia'; (2) utilization of T- and Z-scores for bone mineral density reporting; (3) when to apply the WHO densitometric classification; and (4) which normative database(s) should be used for non-white individuals. Briefly, the term "osteopenia" is retained, but 'low bone mass' or 'low bone density' is preferred. Z-scores, not T-scores, are preferred in females prior to menopause and males under age 50. In these individuals, a Z-score of -2.0 or lower is defined as "below the expected range for age" and a Z-score above -2.0 is "within the expected range for age." T-scores are preferred and the WHO classification is applicable for postmenopausal women and men age 50 and older. These Official Positions, rationale and evidence are discussed in the following report.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16731428     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2006.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  27 in total

1.  Validation of a case definition for osteoporosis disease surveillance.

Authors:  W D Leslie; L M Lix; M S Yogendran
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki; Neil Binkley; John P Bilezikian; David L Kendler; Edward S Leib; Steven M Petak
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone densitometry in pediatrics: a practical review and update.

Authors:  Hedieh Khalatbari; Larry A Binkovitz; Marguerite T Parisi
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2020-08-28

4.  Osteoporosis Canada 2010 guidelines for the assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  Brian Lentle; Angela M Cheung; David A Hanley; William D Leslie; David Lyons; Alexandra Papaioannou; Stephanie Atkinson; Jacques P Brown; Sidney Feldman; Anthony B Hodsman; Abida Sophina Jamal; Robert G Josse; Stephanie M Kaiser; Brent Kvern; Suzanne Morin; Kerry Siminoski
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.248

5.  Male osteoporosis and androgenic therapy: from testosterone to SARMs.

Authors:  Antonio Cilotti; Alberto Falchetti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2009-09

6.  Effect of buffalo casein-derived novel bioactive peptides on osteoblast differentiation.

Authors:  Srinu Reddi; Venkatesa Perumal Shanmugam; Kemgang Sonfack Tanedjeu; Suman Kapila; Rajeev Kapila
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 5.614

Review 7.  Bone density and young athletic women. An update.

Authors:  David L Nichols; Charlotte F Sanborn; Eve V Essery
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Differences in site-specific fracture risk among older women with discordant results for osteoporosis at hip and spine: study of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Howard A Fink; Stephanie L Harrison; Brent C Taylor; Steven R Cummings; John T Schousboe; Michael A Kuskowski; Katie L Stone; Kristine E Ensrud
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 2.617

9.  Bone mineral density in estrogen-deficient young women.

Authors:  Vaishali B Popat; Karim A Calis; Vien H Vanderhoof; Giovanni Cizza; James C Reynolds; Nancy Sebring; James F Troendle; Lawrence M Nelson
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 10.  Common mistakes in the clinical use of bone mineral density testing.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki; Nancy E Lane
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol       Date:  2008-10-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.