Literature DB >> 16731064

Loading modalities and bone structures at nonweight-bearing upper extremity and weight-bearing lower extremity: a pQCT study of adult female athletes.

Riku Nikander1, Harri Sievänen, Kirsti Uusi-Rasi, Ari Heinonen, Pekka Kannus.   

Abstract

This cross-sectional study of adult female athletes assessed whether the apparent loading-related differences in bone structure are primarily associated with the loading type or the muscle performance-related joint moments. Several structural variables at shaft sites of the tibia, radius and humerus, and distal sites of the tibia and radius were measured with peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) among 113 female national level athletes (representing hurdling, volleyball, soccer, racket-sports and swimming) and their 30 nonathletic referents. For the weight-bearing lower extremities, the loading modalities of the above sports were classified into high-impact (hurdling, volleyball), odd-impact (soccer, racket-sports) and repetitive, nonimpact (swimming) loadings; and for the nonweight-bearing upper extremities into high magnitude (functional weightlifting in hurdling and soccer), impact (volleyball, racket-sports) and repetitive, nonimpact (swimming) loadings. As expected, athletes' bone mass was substantially higher at loaded bone sites compared with the nonathletic referents, but more pertinently to the locomotive perspective, the loading-induced additional bone mass seemed to be used to build mechanically strong and appropriate bone structures. Compared with controls, the weight-bearing bone structures of female athletes (swimmers excluded) were characterized by larger diaphysis, thicker cortices and somewhat denser trabecular bone. The athletes' bones at the nonweight-bearing upper extremity were generally larger in cross-sectional area. The estimated indices of joint moment (muscle force x estimated lever arm) were explained from 29% to 50%, and the loading modalities from 8% to 25%, of the variance in most bone variables (P < 0.05) of the tibia (shaft and distal site). In contrast to the weight-bearing tibia, only the estimated joint moment was positively associated (P < 0.05) with the structural characteristics of the radius and humerus, accounting for 6% to 26% of the variance in bone variables of the shafts of these bones. Such association was not observed at the distal radius. In conclusion, at the weight-bearing lower extremity, the strong bone structure of the female athletes was attributable to muscle performance-related estimated joint moments and impact loading modality. At the shaft sites of the nonweight-bearing upper extremity, the strong bone structure was mainly attributable to the estimated joint moments. Thus, different loading history and other features of loading seemed to govern the skeletal adaptation at the upper and lower extremity.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16731064     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2006.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  58 in total

1.  Focal enhancement of the skeleton to exercise correlates with responsivity of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells rather than peak external forces.

Authors:  Ian J Wallace; Gabriel M Pagnotti; Jasper Rubin-Sigler; Matthew Naeher; Lynn E Copes; Stefan Judex; Clinton T Rubin; Brigitte Demes
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Bone geometry, density, and strength indices of the distal radius reflect loading via childhood gymnastic activity.

Authors:  Jodi N Dowthwaite; Portia P E Flowers; Joseph A Spadaro; Tamara A Scerpella
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 3.  Bone density in the adolescent athlete.

Authors:  Madhusmita Misra
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2008-04-12       Impact factor: 6.514

4.  Targeted exercises against hip fragility.

Authors:  R Nikander; P Kannus; P Dastidar; M Hannula; L Harrison; T Cervinka; N G Narra; R Aktour; T Arola; H Eskola; S Soimakallio; A Heinonen; J Hyttinen; H Sievänen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Mechanical loading with or without weight-bearing activity: influence on bone strength index in elite female adolescent athletes engaged in water polo, gymnastics, and track-and-field.

Authors:  David A Greene; Geraldine A Naughton; Elizabeth Bradshaw; Mark Moresi; Gaele Ducher
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Young male soccer players exhibit additional bone mineral acquisition during the peripubertal period: 1-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  Mohamed Zouch; Laurence Vico; Delphine Frere; Zouhair Tabka; Christian Alexandre
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.183

7.  Short-term bone biochemical response to a single bout of high-impact exercise.

Authors:  Timo Rantalainen; Ari Heinonen; Vesa Linnamo; Paavo V Komi; Timo E S Takala; Heikki Kainulainen
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

8.  Olympic fencers: adaptations in cortical and trabecular bone determined by quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  G Chang; R R Regatte; M E Schweitzer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Cross-sectional geometry of weight-bearing tibia in female athletes subjected to different exercise loadings.

Authors:  R Nikander; P Kannus; T Rantalainen; K Uusi-Rasi; A Heinonen; H Sievänen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Time-course of exercise and its association with 12-month bone changes.

Authors:  Riikka Ahola; Raija Korpelainen; Aki Vainionpää; Juhani Leppäluoto; Timo Jämsä
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.